beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eddie O'Neil" <ekon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JSR 181 support for axis2
Date Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:55:19 GMT
Dims--

  Thanks for the great feedback -- these are fixed.

Eddie



On 7/30/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Eddie,
>
> Needed a couple of things to get "ant clean build install test" working.
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-1136
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-1137
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 7/29/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dims--
> >
> >   One more tip (needed to make sure it worked), I'm able to do this:
> >
> > cd /foobar/wsm
> > svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/beehive/wsm/trunk .
> > ant clean build install test
> >
> > to checkout and build a clean source tree, so if using a local M2 repo
> > is easier than dealing with the one online, that's fine for now until
> > nightlies builds work.
> >
> > Eddie
> >
> >
> > On 7/29/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >   Heh...it's neither hourly nor nightly.  Today, Beehive doesn't have
> > > builds integrated into ASF infrastructure (sadly...).
> > >
> > >   If you need to make any changes, I can just move the build to:
> > >
> > >   http://people.apache.org/dist/snapshots/maven2/
> > >
> > > and send you the script I used to install the JARs via Maven2 and scp.
> > >
> > >   For any local changes, though, the WSM build will actually install
> > > built JARs directly into your local Maven2 repository if that's
> > > easier.
> > >
> > > Eddie
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/29/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Eddie,
> > > >
> > > > Great!! Is this a hourly build or a nightly build? :) Just In case i
> > > > need to do any changes to beehive i can plan accordingly.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > dims
> > > >
> > > > On 7/29/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Dims / Rajith--
> > > > >
> > > > >   I've uploaded a WSM snapshot to a Maven2 repository here:
> > > > >
> > > > >     http://people.apache.org/~ekoneil/repository/maven2/
> > > > >
> > > > > it contains these artifacts:
> > > > >
> > > > >   beehive-wsm
> > > > >   beehive-jsr181
> > > > >   beehive-wsdltypes
> > > > >   beehive-wsm-axis
> > > > >
> > > > > The first three would be needed to support the 181 work on Axis2;
the
> > > > > fourth JAR is only needed for Axis1.x.
> > > > >
> > > > >   These should help the work to get Rajith's code integrated to the
> > > > > Axis2 build.
> > > > >
> > > > >   I'm starting to work on two more things on the WSM side:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) an annotation processor extension for code generating a
> > > > > services.xml file given an annotated Java source file
> > > > > 2) a Maven2 archetype for building Axis2 services with WSM that would
> > > > > use #1 and produce a .jar file that can be renamed to .aar and
> > > > > deployed
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me know how the repository works out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Eddie
> > > > >
> > > > > ::::: pom.xml snip for WSM support
> > > > >         <dependency>
> > > > >             <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > > > >             <artifactId>beehive-jsr181</artifactId>
> > > > >             <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > > > >         </dependency>
> > > > >         <dependency>
> > > > >             <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > > > >             <artifactId>beehive-wsm</artifactId>
> > > > >             <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > > > >         </dependency>
> > > > >         <dependency>
> > > > >             <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > > > >             <artifactId>beehive-wsdltypes</artifactId>
> > > > >             <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > > > >         </dependency>
> > > > > :::::
> > > > >
> > > > > ::::: Add this to your M2 settings.xml
> > > > >                 <repository>
> > > > >                     <id>wsm-snapshot</id>
> > > > >                     <name>wsm-snapshot</name>
> > > > >
> > > > > <url>http://people.apache.org/~ekoneil/repository/maven2</url>
> > > > >                 </repository>
> > > > > :::::
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Thanks Eddie.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   FYI -- will have JARs in a Maven2 repo later today. 
They won't be
> > > > > > > mirrored, but there will be public access to them.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Awesome, thanks a lot.
> > > > > > > > Yes, please reply to the thread on axis2 dev about
my proposed ASM based
> > > > > > > > class scanner for the drop in support.
> > > > > > > > If you can or Dims can have a the jars in your maven
repos, then Dims
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > work on the patch and see how to proceed further.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks guys for the support.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/27/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rajith / Dims --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >   I committed Rajith's patch that adds the reflection
support for
> > > > > > > > > creating a WsmService using annogen.  The one
change to the patch was
> > > > > > > > > that I moved the generated annogen beans from
"javax.jws" to
> > > > > > > > > "o.a.b.w.axis.annogen" and removed the annogen
annotations from the
> > > > > > > > > "javax.jws" classes as per the legal-discuss
thread.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >   This should free Dims up to start the work
of applying the Axis
> > > > > > > patch.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >   Next steps are to upload this to my Maven repo
and to talk about
> > > > > > > > > whether / how to support drop-in web service
wiring in axis-dev@.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks and my pleasure to do the patch.
> > > > > > > > > > Once we have the changes and a build in
the repo, Dims can work on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > > > > for axis2.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thank you once again.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Re: The validation part and the WSDL stuff,
lets take it to the
> > > > > > > > > axis-list as
> > > > > > > > > > you suggested.
> > > > > > > > > > We can start by publishing the questions
u had on it the last time
> > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > emailed.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Rajith--
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >   Yeah -- I started looking at the
patch last night and have it up
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > running with the existing WSM tests
passing.  I've not done the
> > > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > > > > to just copy the source files annogen
creates, but that's the easy
> > > > > > > > > > > part.  :)  Thanks for the patch!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Dims--
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >   No, we've not done a nightly build
for a while.  With Rajith's
> > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > > > > > (and external eyes that need to be
on a WSM distributable), I was
> > > > > > > > > > > going to start publishing a WSM snapshot
to a Maven2 repo on
> > > > > > > > > > > people.apache.org/~ekoneil.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >   Sound good?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > does beehive have a nightly build?
are the snapshots published
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > > > maven repo?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > thx,
> > > > > > > > > > > > dims
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dims also things its fine
to include the generated AnnoBeans
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > > > > treee and then remove the
meta annotations from the spec
> > > > > > > files,
> > > > > > > > > thus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > avoiding the legal issue.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie, can u then check the
patch and commit with nessacery
> > > > > > > > > changes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Note the task to generate
AnnoBeans is commented out !!!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         Also u need to javac
the generated source files from
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > > > > location within the source
tree instead of the temp directory
> > > > > > > > > where it
> > > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > generated.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I will attach the generated
source files as a patch. (pls add
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > the main
> > > > > > > > > > > > > source tree)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know how it goes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If we can sort this out on
the wsm side then I can sort it out
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > axis2
> > > > > > > > > > > > > side with Dims help :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie, thanks for your support.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1- 416- 482- 2661 x 308
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/06, Rajith Attapattu
<rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thats what I thought
too. Once we generate the AnnoBeans we
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > delete the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > annotations from the
spec file.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > We can include the generated
source as part of the permanent
> > > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > > tree.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since this is a spec
file there is no need to generate the
> > > > > > > > > AnnoBeans
> > > > > > > > > > > over
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and over as the spec
files are static, hence the generated
> > > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > > never
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > change.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So lets do that if you
are ok with it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/06, Eddie O'Neil
<ekoneil@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   A'right -- mail
is in legal-discuss@.  Will be
> > > > > > > interesting
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how that conversation
turns out.  :)  Interested parties
> > > > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > > > follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the discussion
there.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/23/06, Eddie
O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith--
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   Hey -- something
came up this weekend and I am just
> > > > > > > > > getting
> > > > > > > > > > > back to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this now.
 My gut is that this type of metadata
> > > > > > > modification
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > an API
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > class isn't
going to fly (mail about this shortly);
> > > > > > > since
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > annogen
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > beans are
just generated from the annotations
> > > > > > > themselves,
> > > > > > > > > can we
> > > > > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hand code
them to match the JSR-181 annotations?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   Will take
a look at the patch...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/23/06,
Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any update
on the issue?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/20/06,
Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
I totally forgot about sending the patch, but
> > > > > > > finnaly
> > > > > > > > > did it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > today.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Please review it and let me know your comments.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
We still need to figure out the legal issue about
> > > > > > > adding
> > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > annotation to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
the spec class.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
(Does annogen have a way around without annotatiing
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > classes,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for it to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
generate the AnnoBean classes.???)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> 2.) Generating Annogen beans for meta data
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>     The annogen task that generates code based on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > annotated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> seems to have a bug with inner classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>     For example WebParam.Mode gives compilation
> > > > > > > errors
> > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> handle the inner class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>     So I eidted the generated source file to get
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > working. (I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
wrong
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> here...)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
This is still an issue :-(
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
On 7/11/06, Rajith Attapattu < rajith77@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> oops, didn't think it was that serious about
> > > > > > > modifying
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > spec
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> But can u please let me know about it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >[eko] Not sure I follow this -- let me take a
> > > > > > > look at
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >back to you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> I didn't even submit the patch for this part. I
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > > so.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Please take a look at it then.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> I am really gratefull for your assitance.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> On 7/11/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Rajith--
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >   Comments on both of your questions below...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > 1.)  Annogen requires you to annotate the
> > > > > > > > > annotation
> > > > > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > following annotation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > Now are we allowed to modifty the JSR api
> > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > add the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > above
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > lines of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > code ??
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > [eko] This is a *great* question  :)  and
> > > > > > > probably
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > we've run into this at Apache.  If you were
> > > > > > > asking
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > add a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *method*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > to a type described in a specification, the
> > > > > > > answer
> > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > be no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > we can't change spec classes.  Since it's
> > > > > > > metadata,
> > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > answer -- my gut would be that we can't change
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > metadata on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > specification class, but it's a question worth
> > > > > > > > > asking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > legal@apache
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > just to see what folks think.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > 2.) Generating Annogen beans for meta data
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >     The annogen task that generates code based
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > annotated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > seems to have a bug with inner classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >     For example WebParam.Mode gives
> > > > > > > compilation
> > > > > > > > > errors
> > > > > > > > > > > as it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > handle the inner class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >     So I eidted the generated source file to
> > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > working.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > maybe wrong
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > here...)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > [eko] Not sure I follow this -- let me take a
> > > > > > > look
> > > > > > > > > at it
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > back to you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net
(Oxygen for Web Service
> > > > > > > > > > > Developers)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
>

Mime
View raw message