beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eddie O'Neil" <ekon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JSR 181 support for axis2
Date Sun, 30 Jul 2006 00:33:19 GMT
Dims--

  One more tip (needed to make sure it worked), I'm able to do this:

cd /foobar/wsm
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/beehive/wsm/trunk .
ant clean build install test

to checkout and build a clean source tree, so if using a local M2 repo
is easier than dealing with the one online, that's fine for now until
nightlies builds work.

Eddie


On 7/29/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
>   Heh...it's neither hourly nor nightly.  Today, Beehive doesn't have
> builds integrated into ASF infrastructure (sadly...).
>
>   If you need to make any changes, I can just move the build to:
>
>   http://people.apache.org/dist/snapshots/maven2/
>
> and send you the script I used to install the JARs via Maven2 and scp.
>
>   For any local changes, though, the WSM build will actually install
> built JARs directly into your local Maven2 repository if that's
> easier.
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> On 7/29/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Eddie,
> >
> > Great!! Is this a hourly build or a nightly build? :) Just In case i
> > need to do any changes to beehive i can plan accordingly.
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> > On 7/29/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dims / Rajith--
> > >
> > >   I've uploaded a WSM snapshot to a Maven2 repository here:
> > >
> > >     http://people.apache.org/~ekoneil/repository/maven2/
> > >
> > > it contains these artifacts:
> > >
> > >   beehive-wsm
> > >   beehive-jsr181
> > >   beehive-wsdltypes
> > >   beehive-wsm-axis
> > >
> > > The first three would be needed to support the 181 work on Axis2; the
> > > fourth JAR is only needed for Axis1.x.
> > >
> > >   These should help the work to get Rajith's code integrated to the
> > > Axis2 build.
> > >
> > >   I'm starting to work on two more things on the WSM side:
> > >
> > > 1) an annotation processor extension for code generating a
> > > services.xml file given an annotated Java source file
> > > 2) a Maven2 archetype for building Axis2 services with WSM that would
> > > use #1 and produce a .jar file that can be renamed to .aar and
> > > deployed
> > >
> > > Let me know how the repository works out.
> > >
> > > Eddie
> > >
> > > ::::: pom.xml snip for WSM support
> > >         <dependency>
> > >             <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > >             <artifactId>beehive-jsr181</artifactId>
> > >             <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > >         </dependency>
> > >         <dependency>
> > >             <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > >             <artifactId>beehive-wsm</artifactId>
> > >             <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > >         </dependency>
> > >         <dependency>
> > >             <groupId>org.apache.beehive</groupId>
> > >             <artifactId>beehive-wsdltypes</artifactId>
> > >             <version>1.0-SNAPSNOT</version>
> > >         </dependency>
> > > :::::
> > >
> > > ::::: Add this to your M2 settings.xml
> > >                 <repository>
> > >                     <id>wsm-snapshot</id>
> > >                     <name>wsm-snapshot</name>
> > >
> > > <url>http://people.apache.org/~ekoneil/repository/maven2</url>
> > >                 </repository>
> > > :::::
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/27/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Thanks Eddie.
> > > >
> > > > On 7/27/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >   FYI -- will have JARs in a Maven2 repo later today.  They won't
be
> > > > > mirrored, but there will be public access to them.
> > > > >
> > > > > Eddie
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/27/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Awesome, thanks a lot.
> > > > > > Yes, please reply to the thread on axis2 dev about my proposed
ASM based
> > > > > > class scanner for the drop in support.
> > > > > > If you can or Dims can have a the jars in your maven repos,
then Dims
> > > > > can
> > > > > > work on the patch and see how to proceed further.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks guys for the support.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/27/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rajith / Dims --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   I committed Rajith's patch that adds the reflection support
for
> > > > > > > creating a WsmService using annogen.  The one change to
the patch was
> > > > > > > that I moved the generated annogen beans from "javax.jws"
to
> > > > > > > "o.a.b.w.axis.annogen" and removed the annogen annotations
from the
> > > > > > > "javax.jws" classes as per the legal-discuss thread.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   This should free Dims up to start the work of applying
the Axis
> > > > > patch.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   Next steps are to upload this to my Maven repo and to
talk about
> > > > > > > whether / how to support drop-in web service wiring in
axis-dev@.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks and my pleasure to do the patch.
> > > > > > > > Once we have the changes and a build in the repo,
Dims can work on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > > for axis2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you once again.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Re: The validation part and the WSDL stuff, lets take
it to the
> > > > > > > axis-list as
> > > > > > > > you suggested.
> > > > > > > > We can start by publishing the questions u had on
it the last time
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > > emailed.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rajith--
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >   Yeah -- I started looking at the patch last
night and have it up
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > running with the existing WSM tests passing.
 I've not done the
> > > > > work
> > > > > > > > > to just copy the source files annogen creates,
but that's the easy
> > > > > > > > > part.  :)  Thanks for the patch!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Dims--
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >   No, we've not done a nightly build for a while.
 With Rajith's
> > > > > patch
> > > > > > > > > (and external eyes that need to be on a WSM distributable),
I was
> > > > > > > > > going to start publishing a WSM snapshot to a
Maven2 repo on
> > > > > > > > > people.apache.org/~ekoneil.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >   Sound good?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > does beehive have a nightly build? are the
snapshots published
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > maven repo?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > thx,
> > > > > > > > > > dims
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/25/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Dims also things its fine to include
the generated AnnoBeans
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > > treee and then remove the meta annotations
from the spec
> > > > > files,
> > > > > > > thus
> > > > > > > > > > > avoiding the legal issue.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Eddie, can u then check the patch and
commit with nessacery
> > > > > > > changes.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Note the task to generate AnnoBeans
is commented out !!!
> > > > > > > > > > >         Also u need to javac the generated
source files from
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > > location within the source tree instead
of the temp directory
> > > > > > > where it
> > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > generated.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I will attach the generated source
files as a patch. (pls add
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > the main
> > > > > > > > > > > source tree)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Let me know how it goes.
> > > > > > > > > > > If we can sort this out on the wsm
side then I can sort it out
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > axis2
> > > > > > > > > > > side with Dims help :-)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Eddie, thanks for your support.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > 1- 416- 482- 2661 x 308
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/06, Rajith Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thats what I thought too. Once
we generate the AnnoBeans we
> > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > delete the
> > > > > > > > > > > > annotations from the spec file.
> > > > > > > > > > > > We can include the generated source
as part of the permanent
> > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > tree.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Since this is a spec file there
is no need to generate the
> > > > > > > AnnoBeans
> > > > > > > > > over
> > > > > > > > > > > > and over as the spec files are
static, hence the generated
> > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > never
> > > > > > > > > > > > change.
> > > > > > > > > > > > So lets do that if you are ok
with it.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   A'right -- mail is in legal-discuss@.
 Will be
> > > > > interesting
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > how that conversation turns
out.  :)  Interested parties
> > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > follow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the discussion there.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/23/06, Eddie O'Neil
<ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith--
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   Hey -- something came
up this weekend and I am just
> > > > > > > getting
> > > > > > > > > back to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > this now.  My gut is
that this type of metadata
> > > > > modification
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > an API
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > class isn't going to
fly (mail about this shortly);
> > > > > since
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > annogen
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > beans are just generated
from the annotations
> > > > > themselves,
> > > > > > > can we
> > > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hand code them to match
the JSR-181 annotations?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   Will take a look at
the patch...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/23/06, Rajith Attapattu
<rajith77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any update on the
issue?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/20/06, Rajith
Attapattu <rajith77@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I totally
forgot about sending the patch, but
> > > > > finnaly
> > > > > > > did it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > today.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please review
it and let me know your comments.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We still need
to figure out the legal issue about
> > > > > adding
> > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > annotation to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the spec class.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Does annogen
have a way around without annotatiing
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > classes,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > for it to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > generate the
AnnoBean classes.???)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.) Generating
Annogen beans for meta data
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >     The
annogen task that generates code based on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > annotated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seems
to have a bug with inner classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >     For
example WebParam.Mode gives compilation
> > > > > errors
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handle
the inner class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >     So
I eidted the generated source file to get
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > working. (I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrong
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here...)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is still
an issue :-(
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/11/06,
Rajith Attapattu < rajith77@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > oops,
didn't think it was that serious about
> > > > > modifying
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > spec
> > > > > > > > > > > > > classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But can
u please let me know about it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >[eko]
Not sure I follow this -- let me take a
> > > > > look at
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >back
to you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't
even submit the patch for this part. I
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > so.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please
take a look at it then.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am
really gratefull for your assitance.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/11/06,
Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Rajith--
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
  Comments on both of your questions below...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Eddie
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> 1.)  Annogen requires you to annotate the
> > > > > > > annotation
> > > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> following annotation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> Now are we allowed to modifty the JSR api
> > > > > classes
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > add the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > above
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
lines of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> code ??
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
[eko] This is a *great* question  :)  and
> > > > > probably
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
we've run into this at Apache.  If you were
> > > > > asking
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > add a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > *method*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
to a type described in a specification, the
> > > > > answer
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > be no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
we can't change spec classes.  Since it's
> > > > > metadata,
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > know the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
answer -- my gut would be that we can't change
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > metadata on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
specification class, but it's a question worth
> > > > > > > asking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > legal@apache
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
just to see what folks think.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> 2.) Generating Annogen beans for meta data
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>     The annogen task that generates code based
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > annotated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
classes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> seems to have a bug with inner classes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>     For example WebParam.Mode gives
> > > > > compilation
> > > > > > > errors
> > > > > > > > > as it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> handle the inner class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>     So I eidted the generated source file to
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > working.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
maybe wrong
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> here...)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
[eko] Not sure I follow this -- let me take a
> > > > > look
> > > > > > > at it
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
back to you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen
for Web Service
> > > > > > > > > Developers)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
> >
>

Mime
View raw message