beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chad Schoettger" <chad.schoett...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: wsm breakout progress -- [was: Re: [proposal] wsm breakout]
Date Tue, 30 May 2006 14:57:01 GMT
The changes sound fine to me.

I had been thinking of updating the WSC drts to run against just AXIS
instead of WSM, perhaps this wouldn't be a bad time for it once you
get these changes commited.

  - Chad



On 5/30/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> All--
>
>   Great to see the general show of support for decoupling WSM.  I
> started the work this weekend and have it mostly done; WSM will move
> to the SVN URL:
>
>   beehive/wsm/trunk
>
> with the usual branches/ and tags/ subdirectories as well.  There was
> a bit of work needed to untangle wsm and the web service control.
> Doing this necessitated the following changes:
>
> - copy the webservice-utils classes from wsm/src to
> system-controls/src/webservice.  WSM and the WSC now have their own
> classes that can evolve independently
> - snapshot WSM into system-controls/test/webservice so that the
> JSR-181 web services used in the WSC tests can be built
> - copy Axis 1.3 into system-controls/external/axis-1.3.  This was
> unfortunate (see SVN comment) but necessary.
>
> I don't see a better and still expeditious way around making these
> changes; once everything is installed with Maven, it will be easier to
> satisfy the WSM dependency for the WSC tests.  It seems like a good
> thing to avoid a code dependence between the two.
>
>   Will commit these changes tonight unless there is loud squawking.  :)
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> On 5/25/06, Changshin Lee <iasandcb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 from me as well.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ias
> >
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > Awesome! +1 from me. We could then use/ship WSM jars as part of Axis2
> > > for JSR 181 support (with some additional glue code on the Axis2
> > > side).
> > >
> > > -- dims
> > >
> > > On 5/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> All--
> > >>
> > >>   I'd like to propose that the WSM sub-directory in beehive/trunk be
> > >> converted into a sub-project of Beehive.  This makes it significantly
> > >> easier to ship WSM independently of the rest of Beehive as it would be
> > >> self-contained and wrapped in its own packaging.
> > >>
> > >>   The motivation for this is a desire to make Beehive less monolithic
> > >> in structure so that separable parts like WSM can evolve without being
> > >> tied to the other pieces and to deliver on the obvious interest in
> > >> JSR-181 in this TSS thread:
> > >>
> > >>   http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40280
> > >>
> > >> The next step would be to release a real beta of WSM before the TCK
> > >> work starts.
> > >>
> > >>   Thoughts / comments / flames?
> > >>
> > >> Eddie
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message