beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Hanson" <stevelukehan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [proposal] wsm breakout
Date Wed, 24 May 2006 05:17:58 GMT
+1

On 5/23/06, Carlin Rogers <carlin.rogers@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 5/23/06, Rich Feit <richfeit@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Daryl Olander wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 5/23/06, Thomas Cook <thomas.cook@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Sounds like a good move.  I'm for it.
> > >>
> > >> On 5/23/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > Awesome! +1 from me. We could then use/ship WSM jars as part of
> Axis2
> > >> > for JSR 181 support (with some additional glue code on the Axis2
> > >> > side).
> > >> >
> > >> > -- dims
> > >> >
> > >> > On 5/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > All--
> > >> > >
> > >> > >   I'd like to propose that the WSM sub-directory in beehive/trunk
> > be
> > >> > > converted into a sub-project of Beehive.  This makes it
> > >> significantly
> > >> > > easier to ship WSM independently of the rest of Beehive as it
> > >> would be
> > >> > > self-contained and wrapped in its own packaging.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >   The motivation for this is a desire to make Beehive less
> > >> monolithic
> > >> > > in structure so that separable parts like WSM can evolve without
> > >> being
> > >> > > tied to the other pieces and to deliver on the obvious interest
> in
> > >> > > JSR-181 in this TSS thread:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >   http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40280
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The next step would be to release a real beta of WSM before the
> TCK
> > >> work starts.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >   Thoughts / comments / flames?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Eddie
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message