Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21530 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2005 16:14:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2005 16:14:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 70455 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2005 16:14:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 70434 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2005 16:14:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@beehive.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Beehive Developers" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 70421 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2005 16:14:17 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:14:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of richfeit@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.202 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.202] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:14:30 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so1296363nzf for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:14:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kOhO+qwruLdTzCHnzj4ZmpLOXrH1cb2Ord8JBn5RmZWKPicWZJyRVXC4uEZO1GEdO9hVZS9rvdscKahbaUTx6gPSqPEn+O0pXngT8OTrlYdauEzV1mDJ0DE4tAlR+zr47GyUcY/fYv0Ai7VAxxKJ0TDX+6wD/SZPXaJer1LMdoQ= Received: by 10.36.5.15 with SMTP id 15mr478141nze; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.24.28.34? ( [63.96.172.57]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 38sm6798891nzf.2005.09.09.09.14.15; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4321B4D3.3040902@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:14:11 -0600 From: Rich Feit User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Beehive Developers Subject: Re: beehive-914 -- started yet? References: <43219DF2.3050303@gmail.com> <43219DF6.8050006@bea.com> <4321A147.9040503@gmail.com> <40f0265405090908167802078b@mail.gmail.com> <4321A970.8050001@gmail.com> <4321B01D.9030104@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Oh, I just meant we should take a week to have people play with it if we put it in for 1.0, that's all. I think we'd want to get it into the docs, too, especially where there are instructions for copying netui-blank, etc. What do you think about that? I'd definitely take a look at the diff, though, even if it's something we hold until v1.1. Rich Eddie O'Neil wrote: > Yeah -- I don't think it would take a week (probably just a couple >of hours), but it's a little different than how we do things right now >because we need to support two scenarios: > > - create a new webapp > - inject the runtime files (JARs / resources) into the samples > >We've got the latter and could easily add the former. > > But, we'll get very little test mileage on it in the near term. I >can take a crack at it and see what you think of the diff... > >Eddie > > > >On 9/9/05, Rich Feit wrote: > > >>Definitely, this would be a great thing to have. I have a local script >>that does exactly this -- in retrospect, this should have made me think >>of an ant target. I think it's something that we should do for 1.1, >>unless we want to delay the release for a week or so... >> >>Rich >> >>Eddie O'Neil wrote: >> >> >> >>> It's complicated. :) >>> >>> We really need a target that can "seed" a Beehive webapp including >>>all of the validation config files, runtime JARs, and NetUI URL >>>addressable resources. Today, this is done using a command like: >>> >>> cp -rf samples/netui-blank >>> ant -f ant/beehive-runtime.xml deploy.beehive.webapp.runtime >>>-Dwebapp.dir= >>> >>>If, for example, you just do the latter, you'll end up with a webapp >>>that has the runtime but no web.xml or validation config files. And, >>>that's kind of bad... >>> >>> Would be *very* nice to have a target that just does: >>> >>>ant -f beehive-imports.xml new.beehive.webapp -Dproject.dir=... >>> >>>It could even prompt for the project.dir -- kind of like a new project >>>wizard in Ant. >>> >>> We could do this for 1.0, but it's not an insignificant change. >>>It's *definitely* something we need for 1.1... >>> >>>Eddie >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Yeah, if it's complicated at all, I agree. >>>> >>>>Daryl Olander wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>+1 to doing the real fix post 1.0 >>>>> >>>>>On 9/9/05, Eddie O'Neil wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>I take it back...this isn't a straightforward thing to fix >>>>>>unfortunately because it affects the Ant used to provide the runtime >>>>>>in both the distribution and SVN builds. >>>>>> >>>>>>It wouldn't be hard to change it, but if we're going to do that, we >>>>>>should add the beehive-netui-validator-config.xml file (and consider >>>>>>adding web.xml) to those as well... >>>>>> >>>>>>I agree (now) having them checked in is the right thing unless we >>>>>>want to tackle the bigger problem of copying all of the config files. >>>>>>And, I'd rather ship 1.0 and fix that later. :) >>>>>> >>>>>>Eddie >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>OK, I certainly don't have an objection to that... thanks. >>>>>>>Rich >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Right, it doesn't *have* to happen now, but doing it now ensures >>>>>>>>that we're consistent. So, I'm going to go ahead and fix while you're >>>>>>>>getting the compiler change in. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>:) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Eddie >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Rich Feit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I haven't started it -- it doesn't seem like anything that has to go >>>>>>>>>into v1, right? Just checking. I did update the checked-in files to >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>be >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>of the right version -- this is just the longer-term fix to ensure >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>that >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>this doesn't happen again... :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Rich >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Rich-- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Have you started fixing BEEHIVE-914 yet? If not, let me know and >>>>>>>>>>I'll take that one. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Eddie >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> > > >