beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eddie O'Neil <ekon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: reorganizing netui-blank [was: [Re: beehive-914 -- started yet?]]
Date Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:28:10 GMT
  Sweet...works for me.

  Fix for BEEHIVE-921 should be in momentarily...

Eddie



On 9/11/05, Rich Feit <richfeit@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, I'm just going to remove the 'classoutputdir' and 'weboutputdir'
> attributes.  If anyone complains I can set up something fancier to
> continue "supporting" deprecated 'classoutputdir' and 'weboutputdir'.
> 
> Rich
> 
> Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> 
> >Rich--
> >
> >  Yep...good catch on the classoutputdir thing.  I was starting to run
> >through the tutorials and would have wondered why they didn't work.
> >:)  There was also a problem with the "war" target.
> >
> >  Appears that the build is working correctly now -- the generated
> >files and runtime end up in the right place.
> >
> >  I'm all for adding the "destdir" attribute in lieu of having the
> >"classoutputdir" attribute.  I'll leave it to you about the
> >deprecation vs. remove thing -- personally, I'd remove them so we
> >don't have to support them forever, but that's just me.  ;)
> >
> >  Should have this committed soon...
> >
> >Eddie
> >
> >
> >
> >On 9/11/05, Rich Feit <richfeit@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>+1.  There actually needs to be a small change to the patch, though, and
> >>there probably needs to be a change to the <build-pageflows> macro
> >>itself.  For the patch, this line in user/netui-blank/build.xml:
> >>
> >>    weboutputdir="${build.dir}"
> >>
> >>...needs to be replaced with this:
> >>
> >>    classoutputdir="${build.dir}/WEB-INF/classes"
> >>
> >>Otherwise, classes will be built to ${web.dir}/WEB-INF/src.  And if we
> >>accept the proposed changes below, 'classoutputdir' would be replaced
> >>with 'destdir'.
> >>
> >>Now, as to <build-pageflows>, I actually think we need to make the
> >>following changes, given the move to generating all files into
> >>WEB-INF/classes (started writing an email about this yesterday):
> >>
> >>    - Add a 'destdir', to be in line with the rest of the macros (and
> >>javac).  We couldn't do this before because there were *two* destdirs
> >>('classoutputdir', 'weboutputdir').
> >>    - Deprecate 'classoutputdir'.  If it's present and 'destdir' is not
> >>present, make 'destdir' default to @{classoutputdir}.
> >>    - Deprecate the 'weboutputdir' attribute, but if it's present and
> >>'destdir' is not present, make 'destdir' default to
> >>@{weboutputdir}/WEB-INF/classes.
> >>
> >>An alternative would be to simply remove 'classoutputdir' and
> >>'weboutputdir' (no deprecation -- would cause anyone using v1m1 to
> >>change their builds).  What do you think?
> >>
> >>Rich
> >>
> >>Daryl Olander wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>+1 I think it best that we make this kind of changes now before we ship 1.0,
> >>>this is a better model.
> >>>
> >>>On 9/11/05, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>All--
> >>>>
> >>>>I've got a patch ready which will reorganize the
> >>>><dist-root>/samples/netui-blank web project from a source-in model
> >>>>like:
> >>>>
> >>>>fooWeb/
> >>>>Controller.java
> >>>>index.jsp
> >>>>WEB-INF/
> >>>>web.xml
> >>>>src/
> >>>>build.xml
> >>>>build.properties
> >>>>Foo.java
> >>>>
> >>>>to a source-peer model like:
> >>>>
> >>>>fooWeb/
> >>>>build.xml
> >>>>build.properties
> >>>>src/
> >>>>Foo.java
> >>>>web/
> >>>>index.jsp
> >>>>Controller.java
> >>>>WEB-INF/
> >>>>web.xml
> >>>>
> >>>>This brings the OOTB NetUI project model in-line with that prescribed
> >>>>by Tomcat and used in many projects. It's also what Adriano suggested
> >>>>and used for his NetBeans project.
> >>>>
> >>>>We're getting in the last days before 1.0 here, so we need to do two
> >>>>things:
> >>>>
> >>>>1) agree that this is the right thing to do
> >>>>2) review the patch in this bug --
> >>>>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-921
> >>>>
> >>>>Please do both; if you disagree with (1), say so! :)
> >>>>
> >>>>Once / if we agree on this, I'll commit it and take a couple of hours
> >>>>to rework some documentation. And, hopefully we can branch and ship
> >>>>1.0. :)
> >>>>
> >>>>Eddie
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <richfeit@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Sounds great! Leaving netui-samples and netui-jsf seems like the right
> >>>>>thing to hold off for 1.1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Awesome. I'll make this change for netui-blank but will leave
> >>>>>>netui-jsf and netui-samples for the sake of stability. We can fix
> >>>>>>those for Beehive 1.1.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>This would switch the default NetUI project model to something that
> >>>>>>looks like this:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/appdev/source.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>which is basically:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>fooWebProject/
> >>>>>>web/
> >>>>>>src/
> >>>>>>build.xml
> >>>>>>build.properties
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>with a build that works like samples/petstoreWeb.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Any other thoughts about doing this?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Eddie
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <richfeit@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I definitely agree on #2 (if I'm understanding you correctly) -- I
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>think
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>it should support the Tomcat model you're describing. Originally I'd
> >>>>>>>suggested supporting both because netui-blank is in the old project
> >>>>>>>model, so I assumed that this is the only one we would be supporting.
> >>>>>>>So I support making this change...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Rich
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>1) yes, this simply adds a convenience target to beehive-imports.xml.
> >>>>>>>>It doesn't attempt to fix the validation problem discussed earlier --
> >>>>>>>>depending on how it's fixed, that might be an SVN-side issue with
> >>>>>>>>building the distribution.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>2) I agree that we are moving away from the WEB-INF/src project model
> >>>>>>>>and onto the Tomcat model where web/ and src/ are peers. This target
> >>>>>>>>certainly could support both models, but it's just easier to have it
> >>>>>>>>support the one Tomcat prescribes that is widely used and is easily
> >>>>>>>>supported in various IDEs. We can document how to setup a project
> >>>>>>>>with source-in-webapp. If there was enough interest, we could make
> >>>>>>>>this change now...it only affects netui-samples, netui-blank, and
> >>>>>>>>netui-jsf.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Eddie
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Rich Feit wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>I see - so this isn't the complex part of the change we were talking
> >>>>>>>>>about. This is simply adding an ant target to beehive-imports.xml.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>It
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>seems like a good addition, but one question I have is whether we
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>should
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>be supporting different project models with something like this.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>Seems
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>like we're moving away from a source-under-web-content model. What
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>do
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>you think?
> >>>>>>>>>Rich
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Here's the Ant that will do this; it patches
> >>>>>>>>>>trunk/user/beehive-imports.xml and can be run as:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>$> ant -f beehive-imports.xml new.netui.webapp
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>which will prompt for a destination directory for the project. Or,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>it
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>can be run like:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>$> ant -f beehive-imports.xml new.netui.webapp -Dwebapp.dir
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>which will skp the prompt since "webapp.dir" has already been
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>provided.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>I think this will be *really* useful and less error-prone than the
> >>>>>>>>>>alternative.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Eddie
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>><snip>
> >>>>>>>>>><target name="new.netui.webapp" description="Create
> >>>>>>>>>>a new NetUI-enabled Beehive webapp">
> >>>>>>>>>><input message="Provide a fully-qualified web project path:"
> >>>>>>>>>>addproperty="webapp.dir"/>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>><copy todir="${webapp.dir}">
> >>>>>>>>>><fileset dir="${basedir}/samples/netui-blank">
> >>>>>>>>>><include name="**/*"/>
> >>>>>>>>>></fileset>
> >>>>>>>>>></copy>
> >>>>>>>>>><deploy-netui webappDir="${webapp.dir}"/>
> >>>>>>>>>><echo>Created a NetUI-enabled in ${webapp.dir}</echo>
> >>>>>>>>>></target>
> >>>>>>>>>></snip>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>On 9/9/05, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Gotcha. As far as the docs, I've got a placeholder in the
> >>>>>>>>>>>netui/projects.xml doc already that describes the cp / ant -f
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>step.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>So, that part is easy. ;)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Patch forthcoming...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Eddie
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <richfeit@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, I just meant we should take a week to have people play with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>it
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>if we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>put it in for 1.0, that's all. I think we'd want to get it into
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>the
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>docs, too, especially where there are instructions for copying
> >>>>>>>>>>>>netui-blank, etc. What do you think about that?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>I'd definitely take a look at the diff, though, even if it's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>something
> >>>>>>>>>>>>we hold until v1.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Rich
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Yeah -- I don't think it would take a week (probably just a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>couple
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>of hours), but it's a little different than how we do things
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>right now
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>because we need to support two scenarios:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>- create a new webapp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>- inject the runtime files (JARs / resources) into the samples
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>We've got the latter and could easily add the former.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>But, we'll get very little test mileage on it in the near term.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>I
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>can take a crack at it and see what you think of the diff...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Eddie
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <richfeit@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Definitely, this would be a great thing to have. I have a local
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>script
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>that does exactly this -- in retrospect, this should have made
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>me think
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>of an ant target. I think it's something that we should do for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>1.1,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>unless we want to delay the release for a week or so...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rich
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's complicated. :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>We really need a target that can "seed" a Beehive webapp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>including
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>all of the validation config files, runtime JARs, and NetUI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>URL
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>addressable resources. Today, this is done using a command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>like:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cp -rf samples/netui-blank <project-dir>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ant -f ant/beehive-runtime.xml deploy.beehive.webapp.runtime
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>-Dwebapp.dir=<project-dir>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If, for example, you just do the latter, you'll end up with a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>webapp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that has the runtime but no web.xml or validation config
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>files. And,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that's kind of bad...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Would be *very* nice to have a target that just does:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ant -f beehive-imports.xml new.beehive.webapp -Dproject.dir=..
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It could even prompt for the project.dir -- kind of like a new
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>project
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wizard in Ant.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>We could do this for 1.0, but it's not an insignificant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>change.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's *definitely* something we need for 1.1...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eddie
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <richfeit@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yeah, if it's complicated at all, I agree.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Daryl Olander wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+1 to doing the real fix post 1.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 9/9/05, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I take it back...this isn't a straightforward thing to fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>unfortunately because it affects the Ant used to provide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>the
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>runtime
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in both the distribution and SVN builds.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It wouldn't be hard to change it, but if we're going to do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that, we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>should add the beehive-netui-validator-config.xml file (and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>consider
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>adding web.xml) to those as well...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I agree (now) having them checked in is the right thing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>unless we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>want to tackle the bigger problem of copying all of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>config files.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And, I'd rather ship 1.0 and fix that later. :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eddie
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <richfeit@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OK, I certainly don't have an objection to that... thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rich
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Right, it doesn't *have* to happen now, but doing it now
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ensures
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that we're consistent. So, I'm going to go ahead and fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>while you're
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>getting the compiler change in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eddie
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rich Feit wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I haven't started it -- it doesn't seem like anything
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that has to go
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>into v1, right? Just checking. I did update the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>checked-in files to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of the right version -- this is just the longer-term fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to ensure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>this doesn't happen again... :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rich
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rich--
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Have you started fixing BEEHIVE-914 yet? If not, let me
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>know and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I'll take that one.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eddie
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message