beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeremiah Johnson" <jerjo...@bea.com>
Subject RE: beehive 1.0 release status
Date Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:04:21 GMT
The setup file (docs/setup.html) points to incubator/beehive/v1.0m1.  Is
it possible to anticipate that the release will be at
http://svn.apache.org/dist/beehive/1.0-final or that BEEHIVE-923 will
get implemented and use
http://beehive.apache.org/releases/release-1.0.html?

I see the first as less risky, so I attached the diff that I think makes
sense.

- jeremiah

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:ekoneil@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:05 AM
> To: Beehive Developers
> Subject: Re: beehive 1.0 release status
> 
>   A new dist is now available called 1.0-rc2.  Installers are here:
> 
>     http://cvs.apache.org/dist/beehive/1.0-rc2/
> 
> and the binaries were built at SVN 290888.
> 
>   Docs are here:
> 
>     http://beehive.apache.org/releases/nightly/
> 
>   File bugs when you find them.  :)
> 
> Eddie
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/20/05, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> >   Just finished posting Beehive 1.0-rc1.  Binaries are available
here:
> >
> >     http://cvs.apache.org/dist/beehive/1.0-rc1/
> >
> > and documentation will be available here once the mirrors catch-up:
> >
> >     http://beehive.apache.org/releases/nightly/
> >
> >   Grab a dist, bash on it for a bit, and file bugs.  I think we
should
> > keep the bar pretty high for fixing things at this point.  Let's
shoot
> > to vote on promoting this (or some subsequent change list) to full
> > 1.0-final status in the next couple of days.
> >
> >   Have fun!
> >
> > Eddie
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/20/05, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >   Just a status update...the branch is done and WSM and the web
> > > service control have been removed.  The entire binary release and
doc
> > > kit don't seem to contain the text "wsm" according to grep.
> > >
> > >   Should have a release candidate up on the site tomorrow morning.
> > >
> > > Eddie
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/19/05, Jeremiah Johnson <jerjohns@bea.com> wrote:
> > > > I believe that this is all fixed with the exception of one
possible
> > > > paragraph.  I'll rebuild the docs and check within the hour.
> > > >
> > > > - jeremiah
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:ekoneil@gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 9:21 AM
> > > > > To: Beehive Developers
> > > > > Subject: beehive 1.0 release status
> > > > >
> > > > > All--
> > > > >
> > > > >   Well, I think we're almost there.
> > > > >
> > > > >   I've just covered all of the blocking issues I know of in
the
> trunk/
> > > > > line, so I think we're ready to branch (vote on that coming
> shortly).
> > > > > As of right now, the only things left to do are:
> > > > >
> > > > > - determine status on BEEHIVE-922.  Jeremiah, you're currently
> holding
> > > > > this one; any status update?  Hasn't this already been fixed?
> > > > > - remove the WSM JARs, docs, and source from the various
> distributions
> > > > > - fixup the version numbers in the branch
> > > > >
> > > > >   So, nice work all.  Let's ship this thing.  :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Eddie
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >


Mime
View raw message