Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39119 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2005 16:30:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2005 16:30:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 31388 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2005 16:29:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 31343 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2005 16:29:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@beehive.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Beehive Developers" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 31274 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2005 16:29:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:29:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of chad.schoettger@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.206 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.206] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:30:12 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i1so362178nzh for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:29:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qBmYe31d4Bfgsa+Eeii4uU42BRku8pcNDjCeCrLY7Uj2ucdKZCa9kHZ602jsqkQ1lIfezi8vEwlCbhO4HJZ1+NjbFohLunlLKKcepqsFwOUtUdR6Eh+uYkYB9Ae1tTT8Bd31FqQ5la7RBUBsLqf1OMcobBAccmFiWKNgzQYPReA= Received: by 10.36.119.1 with SMTP id r1mr259724nzc; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.121.13 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:29:53 -0600 From: Chad Schoettger To: Beehive Developers Subject: Re: [PATCH] BEEHIVE-807 : Service control generation gens controls which will fail compilation In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4018_3709483.1125073793642" References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_4018_3709483.1125073793642 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Sorry, I should have been more clear about that -- The modified files are in the beehive-807a.diff file. The new files to add are in the beehive-807a.zip file. Let me know if you need additional detail. - Chad On 8/26/05, Eddie O'Neil wrote: >=20 > Chad-- >=20 > This would be good to fix, but it's a little unclear how to apply > the patch (which files are new / old). Can you add some detail around > which files to use? >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Eddie >=20 >=20 > On 8/25/05, Chad Schoettger wrote: > > I have attached a patch to this issue which includes fixes for the=20 > issues > > Jacob found (Thanks Jacob!!). > > > > The changes are specific to the service control generation task and=20 > consist > > of additional checks for method and method parameter names generated=20 > from a > > WSDL. The patch also includes several new tests created by Jacob Danner= =20 > to > > verify that the service control generation does not generate a service > > control which fails java compilation. > > > > - Chad > > > > > ------=_Part_4018_3709483.1125073793642--