Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34753 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2005 16:18:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2005 16:18:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 7998 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2005 16:18:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-beehive-dev-archive@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 7933 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2005 16:18:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@beehive.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Beehive Developers" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@beehive.apache.org Received: (qmail 7911 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2005 16:18:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:18:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ekoneil@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.201] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:19:09 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i17so297690wra for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:18:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UwI0sLmA+xMVmTwZ5PUwPu8hwsMHW/m9E0J6KF7tMbY+lfoXBrDHGdgXHU1Xk+x7clspdBYBZ7nZ5LSUgpfeBCsDp9ftbrd4h3zIupDSmf998TD5UNY6u9A5/HXyzm8svF2bjg/F7fgPZUbw5Zr1CZS/T3OrD9kuC9V7EbfXxcY= Received: by 10.54.82.19 with SMTP id f19mr3532350wrb; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.48.30 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:18:48 -0600 From: Eddie O'Neil To: Beehive Developers Subject: Re: [PATCH] BEEHIVE-807 : Service control generation gens controls which will fail compilation In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Chad-- This would be good to fix, but it's a little unclear how to apply the patch (which files are new / old). Can you add some detail around which files to use? Thanks! Eddie On 8/25/05, Chad Schoettger wrote: > I have attached a patch to this issue which includes fixes for the issues > Jacob found (Thanks Jacob!!). >=20 > The changes are specific to the service control generation task and consi= st > of additional checks for method and method parameter names generated from= a > WSDL. The patch also includes several new tests created by Jacob Danner t= o > verify that the service control generation does not generate a service > control which fails java compilation. >=20 > - Chad >=20 >