Mailing-List: contact beehive-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Beehive Developers" <beehive-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates
 64.233.170.200 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=NGYoDnVKk+uOssk5CZDeOOtpqCsqHjYDqerDuLNA5EtJFRaHnTAae14pordycqpfqeisgWiFyKQQRK7F/Jnm19MtVKNceA29kHgC/I+1IwMNKM8hsZBuoIAvsDJL+8vX2csAsvnCiv0OzLkQLXSv+KwpkvQD27c33glWoGAknaA=
Message-ID: <19e0530f050705082263e9f073@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 11:22:42 -0400
From: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dims@apache.org
To: Eddie ONeil <ekoneil@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: JDK1.4 based WSM
Cc: Beehive Developers <beehive-dev@incubator.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <e9ac835405070415301970b068@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <19e0530f050703211748b1a820@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e9ac835405070415301970b068@mail.gmail.com>

Eddie,

Please see attachment in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-844

-- dims

On 7/4/05, Eddie ONeil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dims--
>=20
>   Believe it or not, I think it's worth having the discussion over
> having WSM support both JDK 1.4 and 5.0.  :)
>=20
>   Certainly, there are a lot of people that would like to author
> annotated web services and run them on a 1.4 JDK.  Heard that a few
> times at JavaOne...
>=20
>   From the sound of it, you're suggesting using the Java 5 annotations
> via ASM on the 1.4 JDK.  Is that right?  Is it worth considering using
> Javadoc annotations like:
>=20
>   /** @jws:WebService */
>=20
> etc?
>=20
>   I've got a side-project in my sandbox (beehive/sandbox/ekoneil) that
> is heading in a direction that would make either much.  Maybe we could
> look at combining our code bases?
>=20
>   Could you send code (or a pointer) for the prototype you've got?
>=20
> Eddie
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On 7/3/05, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Am sure we have beaten this to death before. I had a long discussion
> > with Daryoush probably on friday and poked around a bit with
> > Retroweaver/ASM/CGLIB/Annogen/JAM/backport175 etc.. Here's the bottom
> > line (i have code in my sandbox to prove it).
> >
> > - We can use Eclipse JDT to compile code with Annotations (yes, target
> > vm =3D 1.5) under JDK1.4
> > - Code thus compiled can be loaded in 1.4 VM (with a hack to fix
> > version, i have a CompilingClassLoader that compiles and loads
> > examples.EchoService i found in the JSR download)
> > - Have code (using ASM) that can read annotations from these classes
> > under both 1.4 and 1.5
> >
> > So bottom line: As long as the code does not use any other 1.5 feature
> > other than annotations, we can work with it. I can send someone the
> > code if they are interested.
> >
> > Yes, you have told me things like "rest of beehive needs 1.5, so let's
> > do the same for wsm". Please remember wsm can still exist without
> > controls and there is VERY little dependency on controls which can be
> > refactored out.
> >
> > Based on this, Can we please re-open the debate on supporting 1.4 for
> > WSM *ONLY* (need to rewrite code that uses generics in WSM module). To
> > state the obvious, Am looking for a drop-in solution for Apache Axis
> > to enable JSR 181 under JDK1.4.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > dims
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
> >
>=20


--=20
Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/