Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-beehive-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23857 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2005 15:14:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jun 2005 15:14:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 50242 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2005 15:14:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-beehive-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50214 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2005 15:14:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact beehive-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Beehive Developers" Delivered-To: mailing list beehive-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50185 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2005 15:14:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from ussjmh01.bea.com (HELO ussjmh01.bea.com) (63.96.162.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 08:14:32 -0700 Received: from ussjfe01.amer.bea.com (ussjfe01b.bea.com [172.16.120.57]) by ussjmh01.bea.com (Switch-3.0.5/Switch-3.0.0) with ESMTP id j57Eot54002096; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:50:58 -0700 Received: from USBOEX01.amer.bea.com ([10.36.32.15]) by ussjfe01.amer.bea.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:50:59 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: planning for future beehive releases and wsm Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:50:56 -0600 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: planning for future beehive releases and wsm Thread-Index: AcVq7+hDavuDxrikT6Wtq5jpyUaEzAAfzjzA From: "Steven Tocco" To: "Beehive Developers" , "Eddie ONeil" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jun 2005 14:50:59.0210 (UTC) FILETIME=[512956A0:01C56B70] X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.2.0, Antispam-Data: 2005.6.7.7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I think this is a sound plan. It allows us to keep momentum and gets good bits to people early and often. +1 Steve -----Original Message----- From: Eddie ONeil [mailto:ekoneil@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 5:30 PM To: Beehive Developers Subject: planning for future beehive releases and wsm All-- Now that we've got a solid milestone out for Controls + NetUI + WSM, I'd like to suggest that we start thinking about what goes into our near-term releases. To me, the most pressing near-term priority is getting a more "official" release of NetUI and Controls available to interested users -- call this a 1.0 if you will. :) Currently, we're prevented from doing a Beehive release that includes WSM and calling it something more official than "milestone" because of the issues around releasing a JSR implementation (181) before that JSR is final. My personal feeling is that Controls and NetUI are 1.0 quality (modulo a few bugs that have come up which we could fix pretty quickly) and that I'd rather not hold up their release because WSM is waiting for a JSR to complete. Thus, what would folks think of doing releases with Controls + NetUI and keeping WSM and the web service control out of these releases until JSR 181 is final and WSM has passed the TCK? This has two benefits: 1) Controls + NetUI can be released as a 1.0 (or something similar, depending on what we're allowed to do while still in the Incubator) 2) WSM and the web service control can continue to undergo active development before starting the effort to pass the TCK Note, this *does not* remove WSM from Beehive -- just keeps it from any official-ish 1.0 release until it's passed the TCK. Once that has happened, we can fold it back into the regular Beehive release cycle.=20 And, in the interim, it can still be available via nightlies or some similar manner. Thoughts about this? If there's enough interest after we've discussed this for a while, we can spin-up a vote to do a 1.0 with just Controls + NetUI. Eddie