beam-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing 2.5.0 release next week
Date Fri, 04 May 2018 15:52:00 GMT
Hi

I have couple of PRs I would like to include. I would like also to take the weekend for new
builds and tests.

If it works for everyone I propose to start the release process Tuesday.

Thoughts ?

Regards
JB

Le 4 mai 2018 à 17:49, à 17:49, Scott Wegner <swegner@google.com> a écrit:
>Hi JB, any idea when you will begin the release? Boyuan has a couple
>Python
>PRs [1] [2] that are ready to merge, but we'd like to wait until after
>the
>release branch is cut in case there is some performance regression.
>
>[1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4741
>[2] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4925
>
>On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Scott Wegner <swegner@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good, thanks J.B. Feel free to ping if you need anything.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:12 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
><jb@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> That's a good idea ! I think using Slack to ping/ask is a good way
>as
>>> it's async.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 05/01/2018 06:51 AM, Reuven Lax wrote:
>>> > I think it makes sense to have someone who hadn't done the Gradle
>>> migration to
>>> > run the release. However would it make sense for someone who did
>work
>>> on the
>>> > migration to partner with you JB? There may be issues that are
>simply
>>> due to
>>> > things that were not documented well. In that case the partner can
>>> quickly help
>>> > resolve, and can then be the one who makes sure that the
>documentation
>>> is updated.
>>> >
>>> > Reuven
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 9:36 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
><jb@nanthrax.net
>>> > <mailto:jb@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     Hi Scott,
>>> >
>>> >     Thanks for the update. The Gradle build crashed on my machine
>(not
>>> related to
>>> >     Gradle). I launched a new one.
>>> >
>>> >     I'm volunteer to cut the release: I think I know Gradle
>decently,
>>> and even if I
>>> >     didn't work on the gradle "migration" during the last two
>weeks, I
>>> think it's
>>> >     actually better: I have an "external" view on the latest
>changes.
>>> >
>>> >     Thoughts ?
>>> >
>>> >     Regards
>>> >     JB
>>> >
>>> >     On 05/01/2018 02:05 AM, Scott Wegner wrote:
>>> >     > Welcome back JB!
>>> >     >
>>> >     > I just sent a separate update about Gradle [1]-- the build
>>> migration is
>>> >     complete
>>> >     > and the release documentation has been updated.
>>> >     >
>>> >     > I recommend we produce the 2.5.0 release using Gradle.
>Having a
>>> successful
>>> >     > release should be the final validation before declaring the
>>> Gradle migration
>>> >     > complete. So the sooner we can have a Gradle release, the
>sooner
>>> we can
>>> >     get back
>>> >     > to a single build system :)
>>> >     >
>>> >     > If it would be helpful, I suggest that somebody who's been
>>> working on the
>>> >     Gradle
>>> >     > migration to manage the 2.5.0 release. That way if we
>encounter
>>> any issues
>>> >     from
>>> >     > the build system, they should have sufficient expertise to
>fix it.
>>> >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >     [1]
>>>
>https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e543b3850bfc4950d57bc18624e1d4131324c6cf691fd10034947cad@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> >     >
>>> >     > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 11:38 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>> >     <mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>>> >     > <mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com
><mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com>>>
>>> wrote:
>>> >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >     >     Le 30 avr. 2018 19:39, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <
>>> jb@nanthrax.net
>>> >     <mailto:jb@nanthrax.net>
>>> >     >     <mailto:jb@nanthrax.net <mailto:jb@nanthrax.net>>>
a
>écrit :
>>> >     >
>>> >     >         Hi guys,
>>> >     >
>>> >     >         now that I'm back from vacations, I bring back 2.5.0
>>> release on
>>> >     the table ;)
>>> >     >
>>> >     >         This is also related to the current status of build
>>> (Maven/Gradle).
>>> >     >
>>> >     >         FYI, I gonna start the Jira triage tomorrow and I
>>> launched couple of
>>> >     >         build on my
>>> >     >         machine (both Maven and Gradle) to get an update on
>the
>>> current
>>> >     status.
>>> >     >
>>> >     >         Please, let me know if you have an opinion about
>Gradle
>>> vs Maven
>>> >     for the
>>> >     >         release.
>>> >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >     >     Produced artifacts are still too different to use gradle
>>> IMHO. Jira were
>>> >     >     created but not yet fixed last time i tried gradle so
>clearly
>>> maven IMHO.
>>> >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >     >         Thanks !
>>> >     >         Regards
>>> >     >         JB
>>> >     >
>>> >     >         On 04/06/2018 10:48 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> >     >         > Hi guys,
>>> >     >         >
>>> >     >         > Apache Beam 2.4.0 has been released on March 20th.
>>> >     >         >
>>> >     >         > According to our cycle of release (roughly 6
>weeks), we
>>> should think
>>> >     >         about 2.5.0.
>>> >     >         >
>>> >     >         > I'm volunteer to tackle this release.
>>> >     >         >
>>> >     >         > I'm proposing the following items:
>>> >     >         >
>>> >     >         > 1. We start the Jira triage now, up to Tuesday
>>> >     >         > 2. I would like to cut the release on Tuesday
>night
>>> (Europe time)
>>> >     >         > 2bis. I think it's wiser to still use Maven for
>this
>>> release. Do you
>>> >     >         think we
>>> >     >         > will be ready to try a release with Gradle ?
>>> >     >         >
>>> >     >         > After this release, I would like a discussion
>about:
>>> >     >         > 1. Gradle release (if we release 2.5.0 with Maven)
>>> >     >         > 2. Isolate release cycle per Beam part. I think it
>>> would be
>>> >     >         interesting to have
>>> >     >         > different release cycle: SDKs, DSLs, Runners, IOs.
>>> That's another
>>> >     >         discussion, I
>>> >     >         > will start a thread about that.
>>> >     >         >
>>> >     >         > Thoughts ?
>>> >     >         >
>>> >     >         > Regards
>>> >     >         > JB
>>> >     >         >
>>> >     >
>>> >     >         --
>>> >     >         Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> >     >         jbonofre@apache.org <mailto:jbonofre@apache.org>
>>> >     <mailto:jbonofre@apache.org <mailto:jbonofre@apache.org>>
>>> >     >         http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> >     >         Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>> >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >     > --
>>> >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >     > Got feedback? http://go/swegner-feedback
>>> >
>>> >     --
>>> >     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> >     jbonofre@apache.org <mailto:jbonofre@apache.org>
>>> >     http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> >     Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Got feedback? http://go/swegner-feedback
>>

Mime
View raw message