Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F57200CF0 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 19:17:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 408A31609E3; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 88879161203 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 19:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 71962 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2017 17:17:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@beam.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@beam.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@beam.apache.org Received: (qmail 71874 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2017 17:17:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 17:17:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id F333B18CC46 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:17:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t9APRK2pSxi1 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 366095FB96 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CA17EE0ECD for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2EF8824157 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:17:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Stas Levin (JIRA)" To: commits@beam.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (BEAM-2859) Processing time based timers are not properly fired in case the watermark stays put MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 17:17:08 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stas Levin updated BEAM-2859: ----------------------------- Affects Version/s: 2.0.0 > Processing time based timers are not properly fired in case the watermark stays put > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: BEAM-2859 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2859 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: runner-spark > Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 2.1.0 > Reporter: Stas Levin > Assignee: Stas Levin > > {{AfterProcessingTime}} based timers are not fired when the input watermark does not advance, preventing from buffered element to be emitted. > The reason seems to be that {{SparkTimerInternals#getTimersReadyToProcess()}} determines what triggers are ready to be processed by using the following condition: > {code:java} > timer.getTimestamp().isBefore(inputWatermark) > {code} > However, if the timer domain is {{TimeDomain.PROCESSING_TIME}} the position of the input watermark should *NOT* have effect. > In addition, {{SparkTimerInternals#getTimersReadyToProcess()}} deletes timers once they are deemed eligible for processing (but will not necessarily fire). > This may not be the correct behavior for timers in general and for timers in the {{TimeDomain.PROCESSING_TIME}} in particular, since they should remain scheduled until the corresponding window expires and all state is cleared. > For instance, consider a timer that is found eligible for processing is thus deleted, then it just so happens to be that its {{shouldFire()}} returns {{false}} and it needs to be re-run next time around, but won't since it's been deleted. > It may be better to avoid removing timers in {{SparkTimerInternals#getTimersReadyToProcess()}} and leave timer management up to {{ReduceFnRunner#clearAllState()}} which has more context to determine whether it's time for a given timer to deleted. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)