Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5700200CB5 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 01:37:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A4019160BE9; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id EA98F160BDC for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 01:37:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 93281 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2017 23:37:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@beam.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@beam.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@beam.apache.org Received: (qmail 93272 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2017 23:37:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:37:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BCC311A0469 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:37:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cqjRHSR76XqR for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id D6C635F30B for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6BE37E00A0 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 20C882410C for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:37:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kenneth Knowles (JIRA)" To: commits@beam.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (BEAM-2140) Fix SplittableDoFn ValidatesRunner tests in FlinkRunner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:37:03 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16065663#comment-16065663 ] Kenneth Knowles commented on BEAM-2140: --------------------------------------- Yes, your last comment is the reason. If the watermark of the Create doesn't advance past _n_, then as far as ParDo(read forever) knows, it could receive a topic timestamped _n_ that will result in pulling elements from pubsub timestamped _n_. So you have a stuck pipeline. This highlights the issue we've discussed that a per-PCollection watermark is not really ideal for SDF, but I think that scope is too big for this ticket. > Fix SplittableDoFn ValidatesRunner tests in FlinkRunner > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: BEAM-2140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2140 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: runner-flink > Reporter: Aljoscha Krettek > Assignee: Aljoscha Krettek > > As discovered as part of BEAM-1763, there is a failing SDF test. We disabled the tests to unblock the open PR for BEAM-1763. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)