Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F64E200C7F for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 22:05:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6DFEC160BB6; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B6204160BA5 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 22:05:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 73942 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2017 20:05:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@beam.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@beam.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@beam.apache.org Received: (qmail 73933 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2017 20:05:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:05:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 84DA71AFDA3 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:05:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XTpfEyCWuVHH for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1CE785F306 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5F2ADE0C0F for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 14F8C21B57 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 20:05:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Stephen Sisk (JIRA)" To: commits@beam.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (BEAM-2352) Enable elasticsearch IO ITs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 24 May 2017 20:05:08 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16023585#comment-16023585 ] Stephen Sisk commented on BEAM-2352: ------------------------------------ I was ready to get these turned on, but we noticed an issue with the JDBC tests - the IP addresses of the k8s pods change more than I'd hoped they would. I'd like to get the PKB integration working (to automatically pick up the IP address from the k8s cluster) before we turn the tests on since they'll require frequent manual fixes otherwise. We've disabled the JDBC tests as well until we get this fixed. > Enable elasticsearch IO ITs > --------------------------- > > Key: BEAM-2352 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2352 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: sdk-java-extensions > Reporter: Stephen Sisk > Assignee: Stephen Sisk > > We want the IO ITs to be run in jenkins CI, and this is the second one we'll be getting going. > I'm following the instructions in the IO testing guide - > https://docs.google.com/document/d/153J9jPQhMCNi_eBzJfhAg-NprQ7vbf1jNVRgdqeEE8I/edit#heading=h.7jl9ndblih6c - this is the first time I'm doing so, and this is a test to see if the instructions are correct. > Once I've done this, we'll have good instructions for others to follow and do the same. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)