beam-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (BEAM-1340) Remove or make private public bits of the SDK that shouldn't be public
Date Thu, 11 May 2017 06:11:04 GMT


ASF GitHub Bot commented on BEAM-1340:

GitHub user charlesccychen opened a pull request:

    [BEAM-1340] Add __all__ tags to modules in package apache_beam/tranforms

    Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
    quickly and easily:
     - [ ] Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
       `[BEAM-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request`
     - [ ] Make sure tests pass via `mvn clean verify`.
     - [ ] Replace `<Jira issue #>` in the title with the actual Jira issue
           number, if there is one.
     - [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache
           [Individual Contributor License Agreement](

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull fix-all-1

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #3075
commit d7479ac3964b0563443bd45940f1bb9ec81bd72a
Author: Charles Chen <>
Date:   2017-05-11T06:06:36Z

    [BEAM-1340] Add __all__ tags to modules in package apache_beam/transforms


> Remove or make private public bits of the SDK that shouldn't be public
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: BEAM-1340
>                 URL:
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sdk-java-core, sdk-java-extensions
>            Reporter: Kenneth Knowles
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: backward-incompatible
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
> This JIRA is for the many small changes that do not merit their own JIRA towards getting
the SDK's API surface right. For example, removal of `DoFn.InputProvider` and `DoFn.OutputReceiver`.
> While the above is not quite backwards incompatible, succeeding at this task surely will

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message