Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF54B200C4C for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 22:34:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CE010160B71; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 29501160B76 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 22:34:47 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 54695 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2017 21:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@beam.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@beam.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@beam.apache.org Received: (qmail 54646 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2017 21:34:45 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:34:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 08ECE1823C9 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:34:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.451 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.451 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XymflOvjlHGx for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id F2D935FE0B for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 062E0E0BD5 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3646C254E7 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:34:42 +0000 (UTC) From: "Pablo Estrada (JIRA)" To: commits@beam.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (BEAM-536) Aggregator.py. More misleading documentation. More bad documentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:34:48 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15933618#comment-15933618 ] Pablo Estrada commented on BEAM-536: ------------------------------------ Maybe mark as resolved? > Aggregator.py. More misleading documentation. More bad documentation > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: BEAM-536 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-536 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: sdk-py > Reporter: Frank Yellin > Priority: Minor > > The last paragraph of the documentation for Aggregator is: > You can also query the combined value(s) of an aggregator by calling > aggregated_value() or aggregated_values() on the result object returned after > running a pipeline. > There are multiple problems in this one sentence! > #1) There is no such method aggregated_value() that I can find anywhere. > #2) DirectRunner implements aggregated_values(), but DirectPipelineRunner does not. The latter is the far more interesting case. > #3) When I use a BlockingDirectPipelineRunner and ask for its aggregated_values(), I get an error message indicating that this is not implemented in DirectPipelineRunner. Very confusing since I never asked for a DirectPipelineRunner. > It is clear that this is because BlockingDirectPipelineRunner is a method rather than a class. Is this really the right thing? Will there be other confusing error messages. > #4) The documentation for aggregated_values() says "returns a dict of step names to values of the aggregator." I have no idea what a "step" means in this context. In practice, it seems to be a single-element dictionary whose key is 'user--' prefixed onto the aggregator name. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)