Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6A0200B69 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 03:03:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id EE00C160AAC; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 01:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 42C63160A8E for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 03:03:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 51883 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2016 01:03:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@beam.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@beam.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@beam.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51874 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2016 01:03:24 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 01:03:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 00762C0455 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 01:03:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.646 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.646 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TaHI7pDPJKTb for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 01:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id 487FF5F23C for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 01:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51812 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2016 01:03:20 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 01:03:20 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A932C0D5D for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 01:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 01:03:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ahmet Altay (JIRA)" To: commits@beam.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (BEAM-536) Aggregator.py. More misleading documentation. More bad documentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 01:03:26 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ahmet Altay updated BEAM-536: ----------------------------- Component/s: sdk-py > Aggregator.py. More misleading documentation. More bad documentation > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: BEAM-536 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-536 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: sdk-py > Reporter: Frank Yellin > Priority: Minor > > The last paragraph of the documentation for Aggregator is: > You can also query the combined value(s) of an aggregator by calling > aggregated_value() or aggregated_values() on the result object returned after > running a pipeline. > There are multiple problems in this one sentence! > #1) There is no such method aggregated_value() that I can find anywhere. > #2) DirectRunner implements aggregated_values(), but DirectPipelineRunner does not. The latter is the far more interesting case. > #3) When I use a BlockingDirectPipelineRunner and ask for its aggregated_values(), I get an error message indicating that this is not implemented in DirectPipelineRunner. Very confusing since I never asked for a DirectPipelineRunner. > It is clear that this is because BlockingDirectPipelineRunner is a method rather than a class. Is this really the right thing? Will there be other confusing error messages. > #4) The documentation for aggregated_values() says "returns a dict of step names to values of the aggregator." I have no idea what a "step" means in this context. In practice, it seems to be a single-element dictionary whose key is 'user--' prefixed onto the aggregator name. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)