beam-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Davor Bonaci (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (BEAM-134) Investigate use of AutoValue
Date Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:53:25 GMT


Davor Bonaci commented on BEAM-134:

A quick doc showing how the code changes for one of the high-value cases?

> Investigate use of AutoValue
> ----------------------------
>                 Key: BEAM-134
>                 URL:
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sdk-java-core
>            Reporter: Scott Wegner
>            Assignee: Scott Wegner
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: 0001-Mark-classes-which-might-benefit-from-AutoValue.patch
> The initial PR for [BEAM-118] added a dependency on AutoValue to auto-implement equality
semantics for a new POJO. We decided to remove the dependency because the cost of adding the
dependency for this feature may not be worth it for the value.
> However, we could use AutoValue for all of our POJO's, it might be worth it. The proposal
here is to follow-up with an investigation on whether we would gain significant value to porting
our code to use AutoValue instead of hand-written POJO's.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message