batchee-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Question about entities in BatchEE
Date Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:11:53 GMT
You can quote what i mentionned in jira.

Anyway would be a too impacting regression to be acceptable at EE level.
Le 10 déc. 2015 21:55, "Karl Kildén" <karl.kilden@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hrmm Ok, I guess I did a to sloppy check myself. I just went to the
> javadoc. I checked the sourcecode in EclipseLink:
>
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/e497e1d72ae6754b0e16
>
> My exception:
>
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/8b7e4752500c44fab63e
>
>
> So Eclipselink bug then. I will open something in their tracker after I
> find the quote from the spec
>
> Thanks again
>
> On 10 December 2015 at 21:35, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> just checked and it is legal even in jpa 2.1. can be a bug in eclipse
>> link or a setup issue.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>
>> 2015-12-10 21:32 GMT+01:00 Karl Kildén <karl.kilden@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Thanks guys,
>>>
>>> the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATCHEE-87
>>>
>>> Seems like a very odd spec change.
>>>
>>> On 10 December 2015 at 00:01, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Also tempted to check jpa dpec and open an issue since it is a big
>>>> regression forbidden by EE spec.
>>>> Le 9 déc. 2015 23:27, "Mark Struberg" <struberg@yahoo.de> a écrit
:
>>>>
>>>>> Indeed we should change this to java.util.Date.
>>>>>
>>>>> Imo the format in the DB should not change. Can you plz create a jira
>>>>> issue for it?
>>>>>
>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > Am 09.12.2015 um 21:48 schrieb Karl Kildén <karl.kilden@gmail.com>:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Hello,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > JobExecutionEntity is afaik not a regal entity because it maps
>>>>> TemporalType to a java.sql.* (Timestamp). I think java.sql.* was legal
at
>>>>> one point in JPA but not anymore.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The javadoc for Java EE 6 and Java EE 7 says this about
>>>>> TemporalType:  "Type used to indicate a specific mapping of java.util.Date
>>>>> or java.util.Calendar."
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I tried a fancy scanning option from openejb that would hand the
>>>>> found entities to jpa and suddenly eclipselink blew up because of that
>>>>> entity.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Cheers / Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message