Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-batchee-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-batchee-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E17119DD2 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58453 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2016 16:54:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-batchee-dev-archive@batchee.apache.org Received: (qmail 58419 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2016 16:54:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@batchee.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58404 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2016 16:54:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:54:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 91E85C0715 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:54:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rnnxijPRvhkY for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com (mail-lf0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 27B925F24D for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id c126so25822287lfb.2 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:54:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=53BFR3JzjZ85hAIhDighf0hS1bfhFZbw3+RZ9ZmLV6I=; b=x30lR8rG9W67W+a+avfPIUmN9tgE8fN6liB04LJMG/t1JSHZpPgxiwAzNlgg75WOka zFpEFCLdnvHhbHlOhP7hXkCKbSPQ1xTAn/N3cfcDkO7WtpX2+UlyhjWGKo0XJYjGhG/q 67sNt78tkjytORB5/W4YmxoOvguMo97Kp6ShE95zDbS811PXwxQaRIeeOHJEWCxz64KJ UwhD2uQPPeHAUCH+2kQkUKCLNyWAbrBZ7N2/ZS/qON8d4kp10JAw27lOO150AWVGCHIV Qe0QpFrOzILUYrBToCowA0J2FMPTIPF5w6TFr576C3BqOb0g5CpSmYll3zxfNGlQx9BU LbVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=53BFR3JzjZ85hAIhDighf0hS1bfhFZbw3+RZ9ZmLV6I=; b=fWnHXxMRbxQ/tNSxbnhZe2oMqepjZ9p+XqYvKd2bBZURkGgN5CX/0ZEyhGfQT5zKA/ a4ig7uEjYguEYCNpuif46HFi7Vq5M4i3135HMb9Ukwpe4sPlLMykoZ+Tr7aDhBxjC8SM hWueSxYnOamb7dmbWlNBV7EhDOoYD8hlMx5gw0mCj5bOAxU26xKOiEj9uSr2OFPk/dcp LfY33uglhRjKChnvNJtyFSEgUEt/hQymof0mQVZuUJ3j4yZC+GKvCaj7v8POqLXD6+37 HM7XMBZzs7iZ7WjnI5wTeOGHJZtSfUtsbkYu/RwB7pOztC0IYdeBpnPUb00L1zpGkDes AVuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVkuu6/tIFCKFiHfyEfA+IcuzkMHgJAQ9KjGa3coT/RwYyQkwu+j4QBB/7RYcsnHGD5f6+bxS0+dJ8BBA== X-Received: by 10.112.147.33 with SMTP id th1mr1744830lbb.88.1461689645573; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:54:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.27.139 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:53:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Romain Manni-Bucau Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:53:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to run with logging? To: "dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a8b1618ad2a053166243e --047d7b3a8b1618ad2a053166243e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 sadly nothing ready to use with maven I guess. Was it for validation or really to investigate something? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber | JavaEE Factory 2016-04-26 18:13 GMT+02:00 Scott Kurz : > Yes, was looking for an aspect entry-with-parms, exit-with-retval thing... > thinking someone already had an example maybe to throw into the POM. > > Thx > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibucau@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Scott, > > > > removed mainly the enter/exit logs which were impacting in term of perf > for > > a not obvious gain and it is easily replaceable by an aspect for debug > > purposes. What kind of debug info are you looking for? If the clean up > was > > too strict we can add a few back. > > > > Side note: I'm applying BATCHEE-69 patch ATM (running tests) > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau | Blog > > | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn | Tomitriber > > | JavaEE Factory > > > > > > 2016-04-26 17:58 GMT+02:00 Scott Kurz : > > > > > How can one run with logging (E.g. in particular, run the TCK in the > > jbatch > > > modules)? > > > > > > Guessing that in removing the explicit java.util.logging calls from the > > RI > > > you added some kind of logging in its place. > > > > > > Did I already ask this once? Sorry.... > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > --047d7b3a8b1618ad2a053166243e--