batchee-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott Kurz <sku...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Question on LICENSE(s) for certain modules
Date Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:02:40 GMT
I just sent the PR for just the Airline NOTICE... I wouldn't mind helping
on some of the other things discussed if these do end up being the
consensus.

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I agreed with you.
>
> About Dain NOTICE I'm not sure it is aligned with the LICENSE but we
> can for sure add it, wouldnt hurt anyway.
>
> Do you want to do a PR or a patch?
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-01-07 17:26 GMT+01:00 Scott Kurz <skurz3@gmail.com>:
> > Sorry, truncated my response...
> >
> > I was thinking the BatchEE NOTICE for the modules and assemblies
> including
> > airlift should have:
> >
> > Copyright 2011 Dain Sundstrom dain@iq80.com Copyright 2010 Cedric Beust
> > cedric@beust.com
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Scott Kurz <skurz3@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> >> wro
> >>
> >>
> >>> > 2) I wonder if the JUNG LICENSE/NOTICE files are needed for the
> >>> > tools/maven-plugin module?
> >>>
> >>> Yes you are right. I mentionned it to make explicit this is thanks to
> >>> JUNG we have this module + we implement JUNG API - thought it was
> >>> enough to make it mentionned.
> >>>
> >>
> >> As the guidelines say,
> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
> >> it is a burden to any downstream embedder to have unnecessary entries
> here.
> >>
> >> Maybe it would be best to add a nod to JUNG in the doc on the maven.md
> >> page?  (Actually the diagram function isn't described at all now).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> > 3) Is the reference to the Airlift project in
> >>> > ./tools/cli/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE
> >>> > correct?
> >>> >
> >>> > This doesn't have the info at:
> >>> > https://github.com/airlift/airline/blob/master/notice.md
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> I think so: https://github.com/airlift/airline/blob/master/license.txt
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Not sure if you're agreeing with me or saying you think it's already
> >> correct.    I was thinking the BatchEE NOTICE for the modules and
> >> assemblies including airlift should have:
> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message