Mailing-List: contact dev-help@batchee.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1383050669.9969.YahooMailNeo@web28901.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
References: <1383049780.44149.YahooMailNeo@web28906.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
 <CAGFtjw2VkHENjqaJZwh8vk-kq_-mqgURjF23=+XgUCzPXrpwfw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACLE=7NzhMgT_bnftxy5yC-C9gpVQuqiVKfXeDprxPNHUPQV1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <1383050669.9969.YahooMailNeo@web28901.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:20:20 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAGJtJfHyG7Zk=VTahyHgKHGT_f_Sm_jm4ts5x6oGnSdOv=qhhg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: source repo and initial import
To: dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b45105e40691004e9e1150e

--047d7b45105e40691004e9e1150e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hi @ all,

@mark:
that sounds reasonable. furthermore, it might be useful to add the link to
the official approval as well.

regards,
gerhard


2013/10/29 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>

> I'd not import the whole RI but only the parts we really use. And we add =
a
> commit message which makes it very clear that those parts are taken from
> the RI.
> Otherwise we would have the whole history of JBatch in our own repos. And
> also all the parts we do not even use. Nor sure  if we like this. Rather
> say no.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 13:36
> > Subject: Re: source repo and initial import
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > No repo yet, jira is still pending.
> >
> > The still unclear part for me is the part between RI and my current
> github
> > fork.
> >
> > Importing the RI then overriding it would be easier but would lost
> tracking
> >
> > Le 29 oct. 2013 13:32, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO"
> > <jeanouii@gmail.com> a =E9crit :
> >
> >>  Sounds good Mark. Thanks for sharing.
> >>
> >>  JLouis
> >>
> >>
> >>  2013/10/29 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >>
> >>  > Hi!
> >>  >
> >>  > Is there already a repo for batchee already set up?
> >>  > Didn't find anything so far.
> >>  >
> >>  > I talked with Romain on IRC and the steps we agreed on are the
> > following:
> >>  > We
> >>  >  will first import the JBatch part from Scott Kurtz taken as is wit=
h
> a
> >>  > clear commit message that this is the original import and the
> > 'forked'
> >>  > part.
> >>  > After that we will change the license headers, do the proper
> >>  > NOTICE and LICENSE file changes and start applying our changes on t=
op
> > of
> >>  >  it.
> >>  >
> >>  > That way it should be really clear in the repo which part was the R=
I
> >>  > foundation and what parts got added by us.
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > any objection?
> >>  >
> >>  > LieGrue,
> >>  > strub
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>
> >>
> >>  --
> >>  Jean-Louis
> >>
> >
>

--047d7b45105e40691004e9e1150e--