Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90659 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2007 11:16:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2007 11:16:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 1698 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2007 11:16:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 1683 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2007 11:16:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-user@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-user@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 1672 invoked by uid 99); 13 Nov 2007 11:16:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:16:13 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of amilasuriarachchi@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.189] (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.198.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:16:17 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c24so1175712rvf for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:15:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=9Ms1HpYt59EiUl5i8sN0UMY4uPaPAz4g6O9k8kPQWQs=; b=Wonxd/crd7zcAZ2wRqRHzDDeQZbYHRybm3g1XzIwnghDdIj/3ZgVSUC1ROXQTWRUBoxiao/vg1JDvoUihgGfnRx+vKrHUKXy1hkQWm948syrnWFqyjYfCoO9aZzpBsluVp5546y7PtkpT4OdRPMnv5/GUEX+GCNphGX0tlT83wQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tcCiOmH7MzJlD7m8UtL1DCTrZvtWr7PKxwxIXCNu4YGtkVH8yy+MrFWE+iMSIxReoQ2OwjH4USGlOgBOjj9r0/7eGk4nEM9bHiyicAwychF+Sd2OWxqChcepXCRTNSuJzyRwtlrzr2Z/4x5Fs5tkhJM13b6H8U8BTKO34pFGADc= Received: by 10.115.58.1 with SMTP id l1mr715874wak.1194952557289; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:15:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.106.20 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:15:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <60708f4b0711130315j4e6890djb57e18eeaf952df3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:45:57 +0530 From: "Amila Suriarachchi" To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [Axis2] Is 1.4/bugfix release upcoming or are nightly builds production-worthy? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 13, 2007 7:54 AM, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote: > > > I am currently using the Nov 6 nightly build of Axis2 as I need some fixes > done recently (post 1.3)and would like to solicit comments from the Axis2 > community on the following questions: > - Is there a post 1.3 bugfix/feature release of Axis2 forthcoming? nope I think we will go to Axis2 1.4. which will definitely has bug fixes and new features. and I am not sure the dates. > - If not, is it recommmended to use a nightly build for the production > release of a software? As I remember your problems were with the codegen. So generate the code with a nighly build. and use it with the Axis2 1.3 release. I mean deploy the generated .aar files in a Axis2 1.3 release. > - If it is ok to use nightly build, is it ok to rename the jars from the > nightly build from *-.jar to *.jar? > -- Amila Suriarachchi, WSO2 Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org