Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83041 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2007 19:29:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2007 19:29:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 33564 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2007 19:29:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 33317 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2007 19:29:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-user@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-user@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 33306 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2007 19:29:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:29:38 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.254.16.82] (HELO cgimta002.cgi.com) (64.254.16.82) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:29:31 +0000 X-MSS: 1 Received: from unknown (HELO CGCDJZE901.cgi.com) ([142.101.184.9]) by cgimta000.cgi.com with SMTP; 16 Aug 2007 19:29:09 +0000 Received: from (142.101.184.16) by CGCDJZE901.cgi.com via smtp id 46fa_f0a4f3a6_4c2d_11dc_80bb_00142211dae4; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:21:50 -0400 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from 159-18-220-79.cgitmsmdc.ca (HELO TOR-SMTP-01.cgiclients.com) ([159.18.220.79]) by cgimta000.cgi.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2007 19:29:08 +0000 Received: from TOR-EX-03.cgiclients.com ([142.101.161.197]) by TOR-SMTP-01.cgiclients.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:35:14 -0400 Received: from PHX-BH-02.cgiclients.com ([142.101.173.12]) by TOR-EX-03.cgiclients.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:32:23 -0400 Received: from PHX-MSG-02.cgiclients.com ([142.101.173.15]) by PHX-BH-02.cgiclients.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:32:23 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Issues with WSDL2JAVA on UDDI Spec WSDLs Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:29:03 -0400 Message-ID: <406A5F89676741468F355B3D000EE54D871B2A@PHX-MSG-02.cgiclients.com> In-Reply-To: <8B0552BD5078074B87F6DC3A7EAB76EB0195F866@MSGMROCLS2WIN.DMN1.FMR.COM> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Issues with WSDL2JAVA on UDDI Spec WSDLs Thread-Index: AcfgNotIufGxMvY+TCqAMGxtvGU1ygAA19OAAABVGaA= From: "Shah, Sumit" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2007 19:32:23.0186 (UTC) FILETIME=[2B439F20:01C7E03C] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello All, I am encountering issues with the way WSDL2JAVA generates java types based on the WSDLs from the UDDI spec. It seems like it is generating the wrong interface for the UDDI Porttype classes.=20 Did anyone face similar issues? Thanks Sumit --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org