Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of atmanes@gmail.com designates
 209.85.132.248 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=fnp29x6MvIc5Wxaw23spar/aCv3M64wAEb0HejR1qZl5t7On083qwiQOM82sZwQqpbIkfi7/5KLuwr1zMrVes5mXVNdC4/GvxjuL4xUsQwbjPTXHaEXo6+3Pzpgv7+MT2yxl1ELMioi+Z1JnBbG2eJQwkzL8zmFHyHcah8fSMxQ=
Message-ID: <bf414ee60706091127t325e6877we9b72cbe321a9a0a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 14:27:08 -0400
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <atmanes@gmail.com>
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Axis2 1.2 sanity check: Can generated POJO service/client handle
 0-length array?
In-Reply-To: <126040.67071.qm@web63412.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <126040.67071.qm@web63412.mail.re1.yahoo.com>

Why aren't you just using RMI?

On 6/9/07, Airline Pedestal <airline_pedestal@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Anne,
>
> I completely agree with you points about interoperability and
> clean separation.
>
> Although, I have a situation where extremely large return pay loads
> make using XML very slow and sometimes impossible.   So I've started
> shipping Java Serialized objects via attachments with Axis2.
> My main goal is to handle very large pay load quickly.   Interoperability
> is second priority.   What are your thoughts about that?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> A
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Anne Thomas Manes <atmanes@gmail.com>
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2007 1:12:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Axis2 1.2 sanity check: Can generated POJO service/client handle 0-length array?
>
> I have to disagree with you -- at least if your goal is
> interoperability. XML is the external interface to your service, and
> it's a useful practice to maintain a clean separation of concern
> between your interface and your implementation. I trust you recognize
> the value of clean separation between your application object model
> and a database data model and the DAO design pattern. The same
> benefits exist when maintaining the separation between your externally
> facing XML model and your internal object model.
>
> There is an impedance mismatch between XML data structures and Java
> object models, just as there is an impedance mismatch between SQL data
> models and Java object models. In many cases the mismatch is
> insignificant, but it's a bad idea to assume that it doesn't exist.
>
> I agree that Axis2 could handle POJO deployment better, but even if it
> were the best that it could be, I seriously doubt that it could handle
> everything automatically.
>
> Anne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's
> Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when.
> http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org