Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4965 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2007 04:57:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2007 04:57:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 35064 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2007 04:57:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 35052 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2007 04:57:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-user@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-user@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 35041 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2007 04:57:34 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:57:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of amilasuriarachchi@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.186] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:57:24 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o63so54953nfa for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:57:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=N44PkHl2/2ymCCdTjcMq9lbLsvuxEWvqDMCj9ezIMM0I3m0HrpEkkDxZrVrcCyr9IXik3QQn8Fn4k7n2Pmze8aPlfx9xmazJeBmxu8VAkY2q9q8YFX2KOZ+WbCKz84E5ZQHd1e9Wz0M8nSPQ/yG2J75uiBYgAJ05RQRE1jB03Bk= Received: by 10.82.169.4 with SMTP id r4mr1258985bue.1170737823288; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:57:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.178.14 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:57:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <60708f4b0702052057p1f11148cqd2cf9b75c0594589@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:27:03 +0530 From: "Amila Suriarachchi" To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Axis2: skeleton differences w/Axis 1.4 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1765_15178800.1170737823226" References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_1765_15178800.1170737823226 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 2/6/07, Ajith Ranabahu wrote: > > Hi, > Axis2 WSDL2Java does not support unwrapping by default. You can try > with the -uw flag to see whether it works. In anycase non of your > parameters would be vanished - they will be wrapped in that single > argument. In addition to this you can try -b (backward compatibility) option. This will produce an Axis 1.x kind of code. Anyway attach the WSDL if you can. We may be able to help you further > if we see the WSDL. Ajith > > On 2/5/07, Sarwar_Raza@3com.com wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Just wondering if anyone has encountered this: > > Using WSDL2JAVA on Axis 1.4, our endpoint binding implementation > > automagically produced method signatures that took into account multiple > > arguments. > > Using the same WSDL in Axis 2.0, the skeleton generated has a method > > signature with only one of the required types as an argument. The second > one > > seems to have disappeared. > > > > The only 'tweaks' we have made to the WSDL for Axis 2 involve changing a > few > > 'types' to 'elements' to get the WSDL2JAVA to parse the WSDL. > > > > Can anyone eyeball something we may be missing? > > > > Thanks > > \Sarwar > > > -- > Ajith Ranabahu > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org > > -- Amila Suriarachchi, WSO2 Inc. ------=_Part_1765_15178800.1170737823226 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On 2/6/07, Ajith Ranabahu <ajith.ranabahu@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Axis2 WSDL2Java does not support unwrapping by default. You can try
with the -uw flag to see whether it works. In anycase non of your
parameters would be vanished - they will be wrapped in that single
argument.

In addition to this you can try -b (backward compatibility) option. This will produce an Axis 1.x  kind of code.

Anyway attach the WSDL if you can. We may be able to help you further
if we see the WSDL.



Ajith

On 2/5/07, Sarwar_Raza@3com.com <Sarwar_Raza@3com.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Just wondering if anyone has encountered this:
> Using WSDL2JAVA on Axis 1.4,  our endpoint binding implementation
> automagically produced method signatures that took into account multiple
> arguments.
> Using the same WSDL in Axis 2.0, the skeleton generated has a method
> signature with only one of the required types as an argument. The second one
> seems to have disappeared.
>
> The only 'tweaks' we have made to the WSDL for Axis 2 involve changing a few
> 'types' to 'elements' to get the WSDL2JAVA to parse the WSDL.
>
> Can anyone eyeball something we may be missing?
>
> Thanks
> \Sarwar


--
Ajith Ranabahu

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org




--
Amila Suriarachchi,
WSO2 Inc. ------=_Part_1765_15178800.1170737823226--