Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77836 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2007 12:02:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2007 12:02:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 36625 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2007 12:02:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 36604 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2007 12:02:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-user@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-user@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 36593 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2007 12:02:23 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 04:02:23 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [196.37.142.114] (HELO nss.lfi.co.za) (196.37.142.114) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 04:02:14 -0800 Received: from kerberos.int.opensolutions.co.za ([192.168.169.25]) by nss.lfi.co.za (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l03C1TkW017506 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:01:29 +0200 Subject: Re: SWA multipart/related boundary From: Stefan Kok To: axis-user@ws.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1167805543.3072.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1167805543.3072.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:05:28 +0200 Message-Id: <1167825929.3072.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-4.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on nss.lfi.co.za X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 I have looked at the mm7 spec. All their multipart/related messages end with the boundary in the header. I still am not sure if this is applies only to mm7 or not. Would it be possible to change this behavior ? Or is it by design ? Regards Stefan. On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 08:25 +0200, Stefan Kok wrote: > I have noticed that when SWA sends a multipart/related message it looks > like: (Trimmed to keep it short) > > > POST /mm7 HTTP/1.1 > SOAPAction: "" > User-Agent: Axis2 > Content-Length: 37588 > Content-Type: multipart/related; > boundary=MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_A9D5ECF2C417B3D84B11678015337975; > type="text/xml"; > start="<0.urn:uuid:A9D5ECF2C417B3D84B11678015337976@apache.org>"; > charset=UTF-8 > Authorization: Digest username="username", realm="somerealm", > nonce="RZs7zw==babe2df5bea49ce4", uri="/some", response="44a", qop=auth, > nc=00001, cnonce="e4c3c3", algorithm="MD5" > Host: fqdn:8080 > > --MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_A9D5ECF2C417B3D84B11678015335343 > content-type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8 > content-transfer-encoding: 8bit > content-id: <0.urn:uuid:A9D5ECFC417B3D84B11678015335504@apache.org> > > xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">MyTransaction > > . > . > . > > > > --MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_A9D5ECF2C417B3D84B11678015335343 > content-type: image/jpeg > content-transfer-encoding: binary > content-id: > > ......JFIF.............>Exif..II*.......................ACD Systems > Digital Imaging.....ACD Systems Digital > Imaging.......d....".......................... > .. > .. > ...............("..&...#/#&)*---.!141+4(,-+..........@ > +$+@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@...% > 67U..............................................A..! > 1.Q.".Bq............?...E...,..o.pi=...R...F;....Mul0.d.. > .c......QK .R f..k....?n/.&.....o.K..X.....vN(.....8.....m..(. > --MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_A9D5ECF2C417B3D84B11678015335343 > content-type: application/octet-stream > content-transfer-encoding: binary > content-id: > > #!AMR > ..@.3 > "X....IM.8L..:....Cl'V......f@....%..H...y.......:.C[E..W.}..4S..,... > .u=Ge.&V.......p.8S....u.2Y......3.@.7k.3.*..........X..v.c..i.8..@.6b.Qs.N.....L....w....W..).\.A....{K"..gC.3.go.!......8.\'..].....D..@.....GWO:$..d......oG.@.......=.p.."....`...[T.KU. > --MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_A9D5ECF2C417B3D84B11678015335343-- > > Should it not end something like: > > $..d......oG.@.......=.p.."....`...[T.KU. > --MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_A9D5ECF2C417B3D84B11678015335343-- > --boundary=MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_A9D5ECF2C417B3D84B11678015337975-- [1] > > [1] Taken from the header. > > I have seen many samples with this format. I am not an expert but it > seems odd. > > Kind regards > Stefan. > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org > -- Stefan Kok --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org