Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of dinoch@microsoft.com
 designates 131.107.3.124 as permitted sender)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Mapping correctly a array type in a bean
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 07:51:40 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <C7FA36AFCE3E8D4298586892AC960E0D051E5183@RED-MSG-32.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: Mapping correctly a array type in a bean
thread-index: AcUV0dlwIaGq2sUxRXyO39fE5gQ8xwCIWkdA
From: "Dino Chiesa" <dinoch@microsoft.com>
To: <axis-user@ws.apache.org>,
	"Sebastien Mayemba Mbokoso" <sebastien.mayemba@gmail.com>

Is this documented? =20

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastien Mayemba Mbokoso [mailto:sebastien.mayemba@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:52 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mapping correctly a array type in a bean

@Praveen Peddi=20

it's not a work around or another hack. No use any patch. I able to see
also the childs.
I am working on a project with DB and Hibernate Framework. In the DB
there are 32 tables and so many relationships together. Before to find
that mapping practice Axis couldn't see all the childs. Right now it
can. And my web services run very well.
So it's the right way
for mapping an array in a bean. Look at the stubs generated by
WSDL2Java. If you find a bean which begins by ArrayOf... it's means you
don't map correctyl the an array.

---------------
Sebastien

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:23:09 -0500, Praveen Peddi
<ppeddi@contextmedia.com> wrote:
> Wow!. I did this and it fixed my problem. I didn't have to use the=20
> Eric's patch that I mentioned in another thread yesterday. I am able=20
> to see the child containers fine. Is this type of bean definition OK?=20
> I mean I just want to make sure its not a hack or anything. If this is

> the right way to define array of objects in a bean, then I think this=20
> is the way to go for me.
>=20
> Thanks Sebastien and all others.
>=20
> Praveen
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sebastien Mayemba Mbokoso" <sebastien.mayemba@gmail.com>
> To: <axis-user@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 4:45 PM
> Subject: Mapping correctly a array type in a bean
>=20
> > Hi all,
> >
> > here is what i noticed today in work in Axis. This for sample the=20
> > beans i used :
> >
> > public class A {
> >  //some getters/setters
> > }
> >
> > public class B {
> >  //some getters/setters
> >   A[] a;
> >
> >    public A[] getA() { return this.a}
> >    public void setA(A[] a) { this.a =3D a} }
> >
> > When i use the Axis Ant Task for generating  WSDL and after my=20
> > stubs, i noticed in the WSDL file that Axis can't map correctly the=20
> > array includes the bean of type B.Axis to guess itself the correct=20
> > type and generate something like that :
> > ArrayOf_xsd ... That's
> > wrong. So how can we have the correct type for avoiding that
mistake.
> > It's simple. We
> > just have tp some 2 another getters in B like that :
> >
> > public class B {
> >  //some getters/setters
> >   A[] a;
> >
> >    public A[] getA() { return this.a; }
> >    public void setA(A[] a) { this.a =3D a; }
> >    public A getA(int i) { return this.a[i]; }
> >    public void setA(int i, A anA) { this.a[i] =3D anA; } }
> >
> > Adding that 2 more getters offer us the possibility to obtain the=20
> > good type in the WSDL and the good generated beans.
> >
> > -------------
> > Sebastien
> >
>=20
>