Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <41E7DC0C.20009@blis-project.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:49:48 +0200
From: "BLIS Webmaster (Patrick Houbaux)" <webmaster@blis-project.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: DIME Chunking
References: <ED9D00474EBF2C439E4A430BA2BE3B8B061199F8@artemis.argon.local>
In-Reply-To: <ED9D00474EBF2C439E4A430BA2BE3B8B061199F8@artemis.argon.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Try what I proposed in the following thread:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110511630600002&r=1&w=2

It works ok for sending files with a big size.

Cheers,
Patrick.

Sims, Scott wrote:
> Mike,
>  
> I don't have an answer for you but noticed the DIME chunking subject.  I 
> have read some articles that state that earlier versions of Axis DO 
> support DIME chunking but none of them provided a concrete example.  I 
> posted a message earlier this (subject: Large Data Transfer) week asking 
> if Axis 1.1 supports DIME chunking (similar post later by L. Piccoli 
> 1/11) and if anyone had an example.  So far no responses to either of 
> the posts.  I'm trying to move large files but have only figured out how 
> to use the DataHandler to do this (haven't tried anything larger than 
> 4.5 MB). 
>  
> Scott
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Milazzo, Michael A HQISEC [mailto:Michael.Milazzo@us.army.mil]
> *Sent:* Friday, January 14, 2005 8:49 AM
> *To:* axis-user@ws.apache.org
> *Subject:* DIME Chunking
> 
> Does anyone know whether Apache Axis 1.2RC2 supports DIME chunking?  I 
> modified my code to send a file as an attachment as opposed to a base64 
> encoded parameter to my web service (Also Axis-based).  It still chokes 
> on sending file larger than 6.8 MB.  I have modified the heap size on 
> the client, but that doesn't seem to help. 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike
>