Return-Path: 
 <axis-user-return-29385-apmail-ws-axis-user-archive=ws.apache.org@ws.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 1187 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2004 09:01:27 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2004 09:01:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 97455 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2004 09:00:56 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@ws.apache.org
Received: (qmail 97425 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2004 09:00:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:axis-user-help@ws.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:axis-user@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list axis-user@ws.apache.org
Received: (qmail 97414 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2004 09:00:55 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (HELO
 p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com) (195.101.245.15)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:00:52 -0800
Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.156]) by
 ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:00:48 +0100
Received: from [10.193.103.58] ([10.193.103.58]) by
 ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:00:48 +0100
Message-ID: <41C7E64C.7070806@francetelecom.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:01:00 +0100
From: WAJSBERG Julien RD-BIZZ <julien.wajsberg@francetelecom.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124)
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: java2wsdl ant task for document/literal
References: <LOBBLFEBMEFFJAGKKNPHAEKHDDAA.ephemeris.lappis@tiscali.fr>
    <41C7E0A4.3080109@francetelecom.com>
 <26144.195.153.139.2.1103619181.squirrel@www.rdketchup.com>
In-Reply-To: <26144.195.153.139.2.1103619181.squirrel@www.rdketchup.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2004 09:00:48.0481 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[90648510:01C4E73B]
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Daniel Beland a �crit :

>In fact, to be more precise, it means that there is a schema element, with
>the same name as the operation, that contains (wraps) the actual document
>element representing all the parameters.
>
>ie:
>
>wrapped
><A>
>   <AElement/> (of type X)
></A>
>
>document
><AElement/> (of type X)
>
>I believe this is not part of WS-I and was defined by Microsoft only.
>
You're right. But WS-I says nothing against it either.

> I
>used to work this way but after some incompatibilities I switched to plain
>doc/lit instead.
>
>If you start with a wsdl, I find it easier than wrapped, and by having
>significant names for the elements you don't miss any clarity in the SOAP
>body.
>
>The java portion is nearly identical (Single java object with getX()
>methods instead of all unwrapped parameters directly).
>  
>
You have to do in the Java code what you don't do in the WSDL :) Both 
methods are correct of course.

-- 
Julien