Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Message-ID: <20040229195532.36048.qmail@web41306.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:55:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Kartik <pandyakartik@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: SOAP bindings questions:  Http and JMS
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org, mike_duvall@compuserve.com
In-Reply-To: <Sea1-F5nlAzn07GHoW900014cb7@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi Mike,

I am not sure about the standards, but IONA's Artix
provides transports for SOAP or HTTP, JMS, CORBA and
others, may be checking out a few articles on their
site would be beneficial.

Thanks.
Kartik

--- Mike DuVall <mike_a_duvall@hotmail.com> wrote:
> My understanding of the SOAP bindings situation is
> as follows:
> 
> The official SOAP specification provides a standard
> binding for how to 
> communicate SOAP messages over Http.  This is the
> reason that different SOAP 
> over Http providers can expect to interoperate;
> because there is a defined 
> standard on how to do things.
> 
> Further, it is my understanding that there is no
> official standard binding 
> for how to do SOAP over JMS.  This means if that any
> two parties develop 
> there own mechanism for doing SOAP over JMS, there
> is no reason to expect 
> these two different implementations to interoperate.
>  In fact, one should 
> expect that they would NOT interoperate.
> 
> More specifically, if a company was to independantly
> come up with a 
> mechanism for doing SOAP over JMS, they should
> expect that it would not 
> interoperate with the Axis implementation of doing
> SOAP over JMS.
> 
> Can someone knowledgable in this area please confirm
> whether the above is 
> correct?  And if it is not correct, where have I
> gone amiss?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Get fast, reliable access with MSN 9 Dial-up. Click
> here for Special Offer! 
>
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools