Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15691 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 09:58:04 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Nov 2003 09:58:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 77050 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2003 09:57:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-user-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 77039 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2003 09:57:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-user@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-user@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 77027 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 09:57:28 -0000 Message-ID: <3FBDE182.7040403@blis-project.org> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:57:22 +0200 From: "BLIS Webmaster (Patrick Houbaux)" Organization: Eurostep User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: interface versioning References: <3FBDE038.7060703@peopledoc.com> In-Reply-To: <3FBDE038.7060703@peopledoc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I remember having some discussions in the mailing list about that. Browse the following thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-user&m=106737614722205&w=2 Patrick. Stuart Barlow wrote: > Does anyone have great thoughts on interface versioning? > > Is it wise to think about keeping an interface generic so > that it doesnt alter much between product versions? > > Or do you publish version 1 and version 2 along side each > other in newer versions of product? > > Is there any standard support in WS for versioning? > > Ta, > Stuart. > >