axis-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anne Thomas Manes" <a...@manes.net>
Subject RE: Axis performance in compare with XRPC (reference implementation from SUN)!
Date Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:07:27 GMT
It's not just advertising. I've done the benchmarks myself. The performance
differential varies depending on the length and complexity of the message.
With simple messages, the performance differential is closer to 3-5x. As the
length and complexity increases, so does the performance differential. One
thing to keep in mind is that WASP has pretty significant initialization
overhead. If you include the initialization in your benchmark measurements,
you won't see too much difference in performance. If you measure after the
initialization you'll see a much bigger difference.

Anne

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Greene [mailto:agreene@romulin.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 8:43 AM
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Axis performance in compare with XRPC (reference
> implementation from SUN)!
>
>
> Actually 10-15x faster seems to be only in the WASP advertising
> in actuality
> it's only 2-3x.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luís Fraga [mailto:lfraga@mobicomp.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 8:20 AM
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Axis performance in compare with XRPC (reference
> implementation from SUN)!
>
>
> 10-15x faster than Axis!!??? I will have to check that!
> What are your toughts regarding these performance issues?
>
> 	Luís
>
>
>
> Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
>
> >You'll find Axis performance much faster than Sun's JAX-RPC RI. It also
> >provides much easier tools. But the commercial implementations are much
> >faster and easier still. There are free versions available for both GLUE
> and
> >WASP. GLUE Standard is always free. The footprint is tiny, too. See
> >http://www.themindelectric.com. WASP is always free for development, and
> you
> >can get a free deployment license for a single CPU (multi-CPUs require
> >payment). See http://www.systinet.com. These two implementations
> offer the
> >best performance (10-15x faster than Axis) and the best tools.
> >
> >Anne
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Armond Avanes [mailto:Armond333@yahoo.com]
> >>Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 2:45 AM
> >>To: axis-user@xml.apache.org
> >>Subject: Axis performance in compare with XRPC (reference implementation
> >>from SUN)!
> >>
> >>
> >>Hi SOAP Folks,
> >>
> >>Anyone has compared the performance of these two implementations
> >>(Apache's Axis and Sun's XRPC) in a real environment?!
> >>
> >>FYI, I'm in the phase of replacing the communication layer (which is
> >>reference implementation of SUN) of the application, I'm working on,
> >>with Axis. Sun's implementation generates so many classes and uses many
> >>libraries so causes the whole result (application jars, ear's, war's,
> >>etc) to be very huge. Another side effect is the build time of the
> >>project, which is really much!
> >>
> >>I need all your ideas/suggestions/comments in this regard.
> >>What problems may I get into with Axis? How's the performance in compare
> >>with other implementations? Is there any better alternative than Axis
> >>(free for sure!) And so on...
> >>
> >>Best Regards,
> >>Armond
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Mime
View raw message