Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-user-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 17849 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2002 19:26:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-user@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-user@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 17840 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 19:26:29 -0000 Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Subject: Re: Incorporate the AXIS into my web app. To: axis-user@xml.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3 (Intl) 21 March 2000 Message-ID: From: Doug Davis Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:26:20 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM119/03/M/IBM(Release 6.0 [IBM]|November 8, 2002) at 12/04/2002 12:26:23 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Axis supports a "java" binding natively so no http will be involved. -Dug "Steve Parker" on 12/04/2002 02:23:52 PM Please respond to axis-user@xml.apache.org To: axis-user@xml.apache.org, axis-user@xml.apache.org cc: Subject: Re: Incorporate the AXIS into my web app. Look at also using WSIF (Web Services Invocation Framework). It will allow a dynamic binding to occur - so your calls will go over SOAP (Axis) when needed, and locally when that is all that is needed. On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:19:14 +0100, Alex Dovlecel wrote > hello all, > > I know this subject was debated some days ago. I have tried to > follow the thread and was pretty interesting. But I haven't found > anything about this: > > My web app (that will incorporate the axis), when calling an axis > server, should not encode the call in an axis envelope and send it > to localhost but just to call the method. Or somehow to invoke the > chain that leads to the required method. How can I achieve this? > > REason: will be quite a performance drawback to marshall the params > in xml format, then unmarshall them on the same application!!! It is > senseless!!! Like calling a local method using RMI !!! > > So could I get any hints on this one? > > Tx > dovle