Return-Path: <taillan2@bst.bsf.alcatel.fr>
Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list axis-user@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 91455 invoked from network); 30 May 2002 09:27:57 -0000
Received: from mel-o.alcatel.fr (HELO mel.alcatel.fr) (194.133.58.32)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 May 2002 09:27:57 -0000
Received: from aifhs2.alcatel.fr (mailhub.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.80])
	by mel.alcatel.fr (ALCANET) with ESMTP id g4U9S8xx012076
	for <axis-user@xml.apache.org>; Thu, 30 May 2002 11:28:08 +0200
Received: from bsf.alcatel.fr (mail205.dit.sxb.bsf.alcatel.fr
 [155.132.205.115])
        by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id LAA18918
        for <axis-user@xml.apache.org>;
 Thu, 30 May 2002 11:28:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from bsbrest.bst.bsf.alcatel.fr (bsbrest [155.132.38.31])
	by bsf.alcatel.fr (8.8.8+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA11686
	for <axis-user@xml.apache.org>; Thu, 30 May 2002 11:28:06 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from BRE04000027466 (BRE04-000027466 [155.132.38.60])
	by bsbrest.bst.bsf.alcatel.fr (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA26312
	for <axis-user@xml.apache.org>; Thu, 30 May 2002 11:28:03 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <001f01c20820$f7244440$3c26849b@BRE04000027466>
From: "Jean-Marc Taillant" <taillan2@bst.bsf.alcatel.fr>
To: <axis-user@xml.apache.org>
References: <OFD6593D23.A4C7D64D-ON86256BC8.004DAF7C@raleigh.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: AXIS BUG ?
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 23:28:39 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

I tested all my wsdl generated file trought Cape Studio toolkit and all is
ok!. I definitely think that XML Spy aren't following WSDL spec.

Thanks,

Jean Marc
----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell Butek" <butek@us.ibm.com>
To: <axis-user@xml.apache.org>
Cc: <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: AXIS BUG ?


> These are not bugs.  See my comments inline between <rjb>...</rjb>
>
> Russell Butek
> butek@us.ibm.com
>
>
> "Jean-Marc Taillant" <taillan2@bst.bsf.alcatel.fr> on 05/29/2002 08:41:06
> PM
>
> Please respond to axis-user@xml.apache.org
>
> To:    <axis-user@xml.apache.org>, <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>
> cc:
> Subject:    AXIS BUG ?
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
> I found several bugs in server sid generated  WSDL ( invoked with the
?wsdl
> option in the  URL...).
> I made tests with several tools ( XML spy (  soap debugger plug-in &
> SOAP:Net from www.soaptoolset.com) and i find this:
>
> AXIS generate WSDL with "<wsdl:" namespace  before almost element:
> This syntax is not understanded  by XML spy and SOAP:Net
>
>
> <rjb>
> The "wsdl" prefix defines the namespace that the wsdl constructs are in.
> This prefix is defined.  The default namespace is the same as the "wsdl"
> namespace, so strictly speaking, the "wsdl" prefix is not needed, but it
is
> not wrong to have it.
> </rjb>
>
>
> SOAP:Net need name attribute in "definitions"  element.
> I found that AXIS does not  include this attribute in WSDL.
>
>
> <rjb>
> The spec says that the name attribute in definitions is optional.
> </rjb>
>
>
> The AXIS version used is the last nightly build  from 28/05/2002
>
> Somewhere else, i try .Net wsdl.exe tool to  generate client C# proxy and
> all is Ok for MS.
>
> I think it a problem because AXIS need to be  compliant with client side
> toolkit. I know that there can be a xml spy &  SOAP:Net problem ( i send
> email to them) but there is no cost to include "name"  attribute for
> example.
>
>
> <rjb>
> Sounds like xml spy and SOAP:Net aren't following the specs.
>
> We could certainly add a name, but what would it be?  The portType or
> service name?  (there could be more than 1 portType or service in a single
> definition).  The file name?  (this could be dynamic:
> "http://service/service?wsdl" vs "c:/service/myservice.wsdl")  Some
> constant?  (rather meaningless)  If you're only concerned about what ?wsdl
> gives you, then I think we'd be safe giving you the service name for the
> definition name since there will be only one service generated.  Right,
> Rich?
> </rjb>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jean Marc
>
> PS:
> I send this mail to axis-dev because this mail come  after a large number
> of mail with no response.
>
>
> <rjb>
> Sorry if we haven't responded to you.  We've gotten rather overloaded,
> lately.
> </rjb>
>
>