Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact axis-user-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list axis-user@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 93703 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2002 20:21:07 -0000 Received: from palrel10.hp.com (156.153.255.245) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2002 20:21:07 -0000 Received: from xparelay2.corp.hp.com (xparelay2.corp.hp.com [15.58.137.112]) by palrel10.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55E2C003FB for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:21:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from xpabh4.corp.hp.com (xpabh4.corp.hp.com [15.58.136.1]) by xparelay2.corp.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58AEA3 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:21:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by xpabh4.corp.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1NFQVF69>; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:21:08 -0800 Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F059A0AE6@xatl02.atl.hp.com> From: "BEERS,NANCY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" To: "'axis-user@xml.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Bug found in wsdl2java, please read Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:21:05 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I saw this bug in Beta3 recently, but it seems to be fine in the latest snapshot. Nancy > -----Original Message----- > From: Russell Butek [mailto:butek@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:19 PM > To: axis-user@xml.apache.org > Subject: Re: Bug found in wsdl2java, please read > > > WSDL2Java doesn't process annotations. They're ignored. > > You'll have to show me your WSDL. I tried plunking > annotations randomly > through a test of ours and it didn't make any difference to what was > generated. > > Russell Butek > butek@us.ibm.com > > > obrand on 02/06/2002 01:47:52 PM > > Please respond to axis-user@xml.apache.org > > To: axis > cc: > Subject: Bug found in wsdl2java, please read > > > > I have struggled for days with wsdl2java in order to have many > complextypes generated. > > If you have: > > > > this is some > documentation > > > ....... > > Then only one compex type (the first ??) gets generated. > > I had to remove the annotation tags to have a proper generation. Does > not make sense at all !!! I believe the release 2 of axis worked. > > Olivier > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > >