Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-axis-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9733 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 13:59:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 13:59:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 96700 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 13:59:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-axis-java-dev-archive@axis.apache.org Received: (qmail 96356 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 13:59:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@axis.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@axis.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@axis.apache.org Received: (qmail 96348 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 13:59:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:59:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of amilasuriarachchi@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.173] (HELO mail-px0-f173.google.com) (209.85.212.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:59:08 +0000 Received: by pxi19 with SMTP id 19so2969203pxi.32 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:58:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9G7Z+D0rZjMIGBCvS6kwjbk0HcPgYhm6rDKu3FptG/Q=; b=m2IUaZttxxrJRCr3cbBe3dcfyAwIthDTJwnA8HZeEvVl6jIXKl9pX0TNzUWBprjvqP TV09yohboyde1IKqchbOjCRZN0sgU/uBUHkFKJZRaxVaXGtIaWujd50b6vpKwY1wRX56 uTVlcUAZsfqeNAly6myCsdofs1pHb7Fir/fF0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BgSYyODn86ltzv20s1k82GMbc3wHwzFt5GUg5sUI6quI4jyxQXpw1Jo1a+uZBVNT2O iIz0WExK+jq7rS/a7jtOAB88lABuLVEUnR19EN7QqUv2+RVnN1cXSfEUBRLmrol33Esv wboNwvRmj4voQz6elB+/9irc6ogiNzlv/245w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.7.13 with SMTP id 13mr5601649wfg.122.1272549527170; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.7.3 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:58:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:28:46 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Performance Comparison From: Amila Suriarachchi To: java-dev@axis.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502bea186adca04856086e3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502bea186adca04856086e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 As I have observed both Axis2 (adb, jaxbri) and CXF gives equal performance (without security) which slightly varies with the performance bench mark being used. And also both of them provides well enough performance for any business application. But this problem is with the rampart as Ruchith has explained. thanks, Amila. On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Ruchith Fernando < ruchith.fernando@gmail.com> wrote: > This overhead is mainly due to OM<->DOM conversion that was > unavoidable because we used WSS4J (which uses Apache XML-Sec) which is > based on DOM. > > This following effort by Saliya et al. is a project where they tried > to implement those base libraries based on OM: > http://wssecforaxis2.blogspot.com/ > > They were able to produce very good perf numbers. > > Maybe it is time to consider rewriting C14N, XML-Sig, XML-Enc on AXIOM? > > Thanks, > Ruchith > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Sanka Samaranayake > wrote: > > Perhaps we may want to do some performance tuning[1] before the > > release of Axis2 version 1.6 > > > > Sanka > > > > [1] > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/j-jws14/index.html?ca=drs > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@axis.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@axis.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > http://ruchith.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@axis.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@axis.apache.org > > -- Amila Suriarachchi WSO2 Inc. blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/ --00504502bea186adca04856086e3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As I have observed both Axis2 (adb, jaxbri) and CXF gives equal performance= (without security) which slightly varies with the performance bench mark b= eing used. And also both of them provides well enough performance for any b= usiness application.

But this problem is with the rampart as Ruchith has explained.

t= hanks,
Amila.

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at = 7:16 PM, Ruchith Fernando <ruchith.fernando@gmail.com> wrote:
This overhead is = mainly due to OM<->DOM conversion that was
unavoidable because we used WSS4J (which uses Apache XML-Sec) which is
based on DOM.

This following effort by Saliya et al. is a project where they tried
to implement those base libraries based on OM:
http://wss= ecforaxis2.blogspot.com/

They were able to produce very good perf numbers.

Maybe it is time to consider rewriting C14N, XML-Sig, XML-Enc on AXIOM?

Thanks,
Ruchith


On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Sanka Samaranayake <ssanka@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps we may want to do some performance tuning[1] before the
> release of Axis2 version 1.6
>
> Sanka
>
> [1] http://www.ibm.com/developerw= orks/webservices/library/j-jws14/index.html?ca=3Ddrs
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------<= br> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@axis.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@axis.apache.org
>
>



--
http://ruchith.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@axis.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@axis.apache.org




--
Amila Suria= rachchi
WSO2 Inc.
blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/
--00504502bea186adca04856086e3--