Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27164 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2009 21:52:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2009 21:52:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 43458 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 21:52:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 43344 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 21:52:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 43331 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2009 21:52:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:52:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of deepalk@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.176] (HELO mail-yw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.211.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:52:22 +0000 Received: by ywh6 with SMTP id 6so8280273ywh.0 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:52:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+33+bH0mkc+TUhc4qymiPwcTLmeHQIV8oXBvx0hkxLU=; b=tZaOqsXVFQG4vkhEd31KWHIvIbfB3JWmslIlgxy7YpcsLTenw+KDh4AQuS6vOdYL7+ HOFKQGAo/y5rjpJGdxCopXT4N7gz9dGcv+Ij2WvsTYTnYI4XqqOlTJ4KxhuIt4Ry+W14 vPTa4dMZy+DJmumcmHyYihuO9mJCAjZD6NtpI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UY10ePqdp7paU0+BrMVleRt/F5tzlO5DHMTEDNY1cg+w/djB1vQ4bt7RnE6jotiGag Yp21lbLQbNl0Todm1TOL48/0AYqNTgXRywP549bHmtGjal9r6zRjXTB780XPSg7iAfqq K7hBi2K6F8Vm4ziAkiOlu6HopGeBbLJJvoWgE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.106.12 with SMTP id e12mr7760944anc.89.1249336321336; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:52:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A7749D4.2020206@thoughtcraft.com> References: <4A7749D4.2020206@thoughtcraft.com> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:52:01 -0400 Message-ID: <58e502250908031452k76c8ce4cr8d9b0f87bc02eac7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [axis2] Releasing 1.5.1 From: Deepal Jayasinghe To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Glen Daniels wrote: > Hi folks: > > So, there are currently no JIRAs left targeted for 1.5.1, and there were = at > least a few major fixes (in particular the CLOSE_WAIT issues, transport > deployer fix, and the module versioning stuff) since 1.5 that I for one w= ould > really like to get out into the world ASAP. But we have 17 blockers? so are we going to keep them as it is or are we going address them. As I remember correct we do not do releases when we have blockers. Either we fix them or down grade them. > > What needs to happen before we release 1.5.1? =A0We need to do a transpor= ts > release for sure, but that doesn't absolutely need to block 1.5.1, right? > Ditto with Rampart / Sandesha - we should get those out ASAP (and the tea= ms > are working on it IIRC) but again putting out 1.5.1 shouldn't be gated on= that. > > I'll clean up the docs a bit, but aside from that are people OK if I get = the > release train rolling to get these fixes out? Great, and thank you very much for doing all those. Thanks, Deepal > > Thanks, > --Glen > --=20 http://blogs.deepal.org