axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Deepal jayasinghe <deep...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Please revert API changes done as per AXIS2-4465
Date Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:05:40 GMT

>
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Deepal jayasinghe <deepalk@gmail.com
> <mailto:deepalk@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     If you feel so I am so sorry, it was not intensional, I really like
>     Axis2 not because I have contributed to it but because it is a useful
>     project. When I see someone try to break something in the project
>     it is
>     hard for me to keep silent.
>
>
> But 40 minutes prior to that in reply to Andreas' mail you wrote:
>
> =====
> It is so sad to hear this, I know you contributed a lot and helped to
> move the project forward. When we implement a feature we can not
> consider all the projects using it. Just think one more time, we really
> need your help ....., I really value your contribution.
> =====
I am sorry . I think my bad English made you misunderstand what I meant .

As I mentioned Axis2 is a very useful project and we can not make the
changes as we wish (since the project is matured).  If I had  a chance
to go though Andreas's  patch I would have argued the same way as I did
with Isuru. 

Having said that  when I implement a feature we can not consider all the
projects using it (For example I do not know what kind of features of
Axis2 that Tuscany uses), however if I know I am going to break some of
the existing stuff in Axis2 I will not do that or will not let others to
do it (like in Isuru's case). But if I got to know that I have break
something on other dependent project (though JIRA or emails) , then I
would consider fixing the issue to solve their problem too.
>
> So its ok for one person to break things (Andreas, which is what
> started this thread)
I hope you can understand it is hard for me to find time to go though
Axis2 mails, when Andreas's patch mailing thread taking place I was so
busy with my assignments so did not have  time. Unfortunately I had a
chance to go though Isuru's mail yesterday, that wasted my whole day for
nothing.
> but not the other (Isuru, on the hierarchical service stuff)? Why the
> double standard?
>
It is not double stand, I already mentioned the rational behind that. It
about time...,Otherwise I do not care who the person is if he trying to
break anything, I have done that to Dims, Glen, Amila and few others (of
course when I had time).

I think this will be the last time I am going to say "NO" to any new
feature adding or existing stuff breaking, I will simply do not care it
anymore (I do not have time to waste). But will still to reply to mails
in axis-user list.

Thanks,
Deepal
> (I haven't read thru the hierarchical service thread yet; I will and I
> will reply to it - my belief is that it doesn't need to break anything
> that works now but maybe the way its been done is not that way. Anyway
> I will read thru that thread and reply later.
>
> Sanjiva.
> -- 
> Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
> Founder, Director & Chief Scientist; Lanka Software Foundation;
> http://www.opensource.lk/
> Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
> Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
>
> Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/


-- 
Thank you!


http://blogs.deepal.org
http://deepal.org


Mime
View raw message