Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16759 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2008 01:04:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2008 01:04:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 97724 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2008 01:04:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 97575 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2008 01:04:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 97554 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2008 01:04:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:04:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of deepalk@gmail.com designates 64.233.178.245 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.178.245] (HELO hs-out-0708.google.com) (64.233.178.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:02:52 +0000 Received: by hs-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id x43so854159hsb.0 for ; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:03:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D6mOLchv4khVmboeHJwPZAgYmyScRSeLQFIru8pgti8=; b=MMx1+QiD+gt5wmzV0NfwU1ZPQbFyLQGYdKeDqmCvjUYN8KbkJ0HZ6Sj8xfDOn6bKDn Ta6m8lz8BpwibdEdrZQIrQuF7x7M3QJ7f1EvdpDeUAfWZRXvykak7yOEcLlQLYKdxuzb wbywLxrtVhJQadrVM7Eo50XX5yAkgQwChISc4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=gU8z0k4tE25a2MxOfDwfbtlJ1pKthd0Kq8LbTJ2fVlHi4cNxtSvAyagNvfQpfYISr9 Q7ONwWDYvx4IZh8ebK5lhdexg8wG7zvmwROMgE+7YwyVPVTjhnM+EXY0xHFgj4rMlN9U qRa9HcjtxphxWB4DWyraCtDXLd52W9BtZGu88= Received: by 10.150.12.3 with SMTP id 3mr23881939ybl.17.1225587802587; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.101? (adsl-218-104-115.asm.bellsouth.net [68.218.104.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm4716845ywf.2.2008.11.01.18.03.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <490CFC5A.901@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:03:22 -0400 From: Deepal jayasinghe User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org, "general@ws.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Axis2 as TLP References: <19e0530f0810261629w59dd1c1bm61a18aa343763a40@mail.gmail.com> <19e0530f0810301442n663756ebk66fe47a5b4db05e1@mail.gmail.com> <12f870d60810301507y179fe01dle59eca4c0808c95c@mail.gmail.com> <19e0530f0810301628k5ad46d8ucd06a6c15c91597a@mail.gmail.com> <490AC1BC.6080803@gmail.com> <19e0530f0810310311u455a8ec8q456e76cc2a64c10c@mail.gmail.com> <490AEEF8.1010908@gmail.com> <19e0530f0810310651k40b8d197vf20f2df65d15c030@mail.gmail.com> <88f5d710810310759u7c5abe6ckdf936b30a61fe8c3@mail.gmail.com> <12f870d60810312027s4814f89bwc122f90b5f423ff1@mail.gmail.com> <490BDFD6.9030700@gmail.com> <490C965A.8070902@opensource.lk> In-Reply-To: <490C965A.8070902@opensource.lk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >>> hen they selected George W for the second time ;) >> Ok why do you want to move Axiom out from Axis2 , because it has a big >> advantage when it is there in WS than in Axis2. > > Deepal, so just so I understand - are you saying you *don't* want to > keep Axiom with Axis2? Yes we need to keep Axiom inside Axis2 I mean as a subproject .What I mentioned was once we move Axiom as a separate subproject , we had a number of good out comes. - Visibility increased - Project other than WS started to use that. > >> My concern is , Axis2 does not get what it is supposed to get. It is >> just stay inside something called WS. While some other Web service >> project acting as TLP. > > What exactly is axis2 to "supposed to get" that its not getting. Dims > feels that the community is sleeping (paraphrasing) and thinks that > going TLP will change that. You seem to think that there's other stuff > we're spsed to get - please indicate what that is? Axis2 should not hide under WS , it has to be more than that. For example if I want to find some of the good project in company X what I should do is I go to that home page of company X and see whats there. However the probability of going inside and inside and check to see whether there are any more project is very less. Well I am talking about my self , but I believe I am not the only person doing that in this world. > >> I am sorry I do not want to rename WS into something other than Axis2. >> If we are going to rename then that should be into Axis2 (which include >> both java and c). > > So again, what does s/ws/axis2/g buy us? Visibility , and users tend to believe that Axis2 is not yet another sub project in Axis2. At the moment it has an unnecessary wrapper called WS around Axis2 , IMO which is not needed. Deepal > > Sanjiva. -- Thank you! http://blogs.deepal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org