Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27278 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2008 22:18:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2008 22:18:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 98118 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2008 22:18:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 98068 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2008 22:18:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 98057 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2008 22:18:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:18:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of amra@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.141 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.141] (HELO e1.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:17:50 +0000 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m75MF4SI007704 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:15:04 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m75MF4Mt217606 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:15:04 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m75MF3OR017628 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:15:03 -0400 Received: from d27ml101.rchland.ibm.com (d27ml101.rchland.ibm.com [9.10.229.40]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m75MF3tG017615 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:15:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <304E9E55F6A4BE4B910C2437D4D1B4960B22D20CAC@MERCMBX14.na.sas.com> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: "axis-dev@ws.apache.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: service scope X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006 Message-ID: From: Nadir Amra Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:15:12 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on d27ml101/27/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 08/05/2008 05:15:02 PM, Serialize complete at 08/05/2008 05:15:02 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Tony, Is there a JIRA opened for the bug? If not, can you open one? Nadir Amra Tony Dean wrote on 08/05/2008 04:27:37 PM: > Hi, > > I have my service scope set to "application" even though my service > is stateless. That is, I do not store any session information with > my service. My thinking was by loading only one instance of my > implementation class (not reloading on every request which is the > case for "request" scope), it would perform better. > > However, there is a bug in Axis2 such that serviceGroupContext > (serviceContext) are never purged from the ConfigurationContext when > a service is removed. Therefore, if a new service by the same name > is later added it will be associated with the old implementation > class. The only way to remedy this situation is to restart Axis2 > and/or the server. > > So, I'm wondering if am I gaining that much of a performance boost > by using "application" scope? Please advise. > > Thank you. > > Tony Dean > SAS Institute Inc. > 919.531.6704 > tony.dean@sas.com > > SAS... The Power to Know > http://www.sas.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org