Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates
 209.85.198.247 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=LP1RbohURHT5N0oK8jGyN7DSvi8+k8axaeqwH921xhYm3m/v484h/xMsEHnryY4DrX
         VY9WZ6TmvSmNl6xa+MnJ9Id/9xlQ5vFz9ePrUKDlXBOwBNTBs84WiTO3gTTZtmuwUPIM
         gmrTaOCQKpTDM087+Pd3uH+Fvic9l+wgqY824=
Message-ID: <4857AB6A.5070609@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:17:46 -0400
From: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Extensions to Axis2/Java deployment engine
References: 
 <OF7C14F969.D9754135-ON80257467.00328437-80257467.0032C3D1@uk.ibm.com>
	 <48523D2E.2080403@gmail.com>
	 <AD0C8E6047016B48A53660CD4888CE39036D531F@namail4.corp.adobe.com>
 <aa8fdb10806170458o6c110280wc09c29cc8c087f04@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <aa8fdb10806170458o6c110280wc09c29cc8c087f04@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Saminda,

Can we please keep the OSGi stuff in separate maven module for now? We can still use maven magic to generate a
axis2-kernel and axis2-adb jar with whatever you need inside, but as an artifact inside the OSGi maven module.

That will avoid dragging in osgi jars in the main build and keep everyone happy till we convince them :)

thanks,
dims

Saminda Abeyruwan wrote:
| Hi Devs,
|
| First phase of the implementation plan is to use axis2-kernel, axis2-adb and
| create the org.apache.axis2.osgi_<version>.jar bundle, which will salvage
| some existing code from current Axis2 OSGi implementation. New
| implementation will include the activator, builders, and most importantly
| AxisConfigurator. I will package legacy jars as bundles and use the existing
| bundles, which will be fully operational  in  Equinox. Will provide you with
| the working sample asap.
|
| I wanted to write the activator and stuff to axis2-kernel and axis2-adb
| itself. But for the first step lets provide this as an extension.
|
| Thank you!
|
| Saminda
|
| On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Tom Jordahl <tjordahl@adobe.com> wrote:
|
|> I haven't finished wading through the whole thread on this, but I fully
|> support Deepal's position that Axis2 should focus on supporting its user
|> base by not breaking things.
|>
|> There is functionality that users have asked for (hey, do we support
|> consuming rpc/encoded services via ADB yet?) that would seem to me
|> should take priority over OSGi.
|>
|> --
|> Tom Jordahl
|>
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: Deepal jayasinghe [mailto:deepalk@gmail.com]
|> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:26 AM
|> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
|> Subject: Re: Extensions to Axis2/Java deployment engine
|>
|> After reading all the mails , I still in the position that , YES we need
|>
|> to support OSGi. But , its better if we can do that without changing the
|>
|> core module. So I will help my best to write a OSGi based Axis
|> configurator which does not touches the existing core code base
|> (deployment side of it) , but will make sure to have what Saminda
|> mentioned in the initial mail.
|>
|> Comments .... ??
|>
|> -Deepal
|>> Over in Apache Tuscany we're actively working on changing to have OSGi
|>> a more integral part of the SCA runtime so anything Axis2 does to be
|>> more OSGi friendly would be useful to Tuscany.
|>>
|>>    ...ant
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>> *Deepal Jayasinghe <deepal@opensource.lk>*
|>>
|>> 13/06/2008 10:06
|>> Please respond to
|>> axis-dev@ws.apache.org
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>> To
|>>       axis-dev@ws.apache.org
|>> cc
|>>
|>> Subject
|>>       Re: Extensions to Axis2/Java deployment engine
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>> Hi  Venkat,
|>>
|>> I really appreciate your post , if there are users like who really
|> need
|>> OSGi , then we really should consider providing OSGi support out of
|>> the box.
|>>> I agree. Currently I'm evaluating Axis2.0 for embedding it in one of
|>>> our products which is built on equinox platform. If Axis2.0 features
|>>> are available as OSGi bundles, it would help Axis2.0 adaption in
|>>> future, I guess.
|>>>
|>>> - venkat
|>>>
|>>>
|>>
|>>
|>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
|>> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>>
|> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|>> /
|>> /
|>>
|>> /Unless stated otherwise above:
|>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
|>> number 741598.
|>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
|>> 3AU/
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>>
|>>
|> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
|> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|>
|>
|> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
|> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|>
|>
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)

iD8DBQFIV6tpgNg6eWEDv1kRAsdVAKChiZOjplARJPOFJnKDbd2Ya58U5wCfQ4R/
QjZ3ykpffoPG4g22OmpU9IE=
=TAax
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org