axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Illsley" <>
Subject Re: [Axis2] arbitrary prefix for anon operations?
Date Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:29:34 GMT
In general I'm against using bits of a QName for anything other than
bits of a 'real' QName... it just feels likely to confuse. A parameter
sounds feasible and clean option, perhaps there are others.

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Dustin Amrhein <> wrote:
> Have we explored storing a specific Parameter on the AxisOperation that told
> them an operation was not a user-defined operation? I know there is very
> little chance of a collision with a user-defined operation, but there is
> still a small chance. Is storing a parameter on the AxisOperation instead a
> feasible option?
> Michael Rheinheimer <> wrote:
> Hi,
> The sandesha team has requested that a custom prefix be included in the
> QNames of the anonymous operations (anonOutInOp, etc) to differentiate
> axis2-originated anon operations from customer-defined operations.  Is it
> simply a matter of adding a prefix to the QName definitions in kernel code:
> org.apache.axis2.client.ServiceClient?  Doing so caused no errors in my
> testing, but I am certainly capable of overlooking something, and this is
> core kernel stuff, so please help me out!  See related Jira:
> Thank you much!
> mike
>  __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message