Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33372 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2007 23:37:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2007 23:37:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 11408 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2007 23:37:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 11331 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2007 23:37:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 11320 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2007 23:37:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 16:37:38 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.123.75.163] (HELO sosnoski.com) (206.123.75.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:37:38 +0000 Received: from dev.sosnoski.com (ip-58-28-158-218.ubs-dsl.xnet.co.nz [58.28.158.218]) (authenticated bits=0) by sosnoski.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l97Nb9lm025040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:37:16 -0400 Message-ID: <47096DD5.70702@sosnoski.com> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:37:57 +1300 From: Dennis Sosnoski Organization: Sosnoski Software User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070620) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Infoset / TCP transport References: <88f5d710710071230s9529e1fq27bb282f54713e3e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <88f5d710710071230s9529e1fq27bb282f54713e3e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Paul, I think it's an interesting possibility. I've been trying to find out what .Net is currently using for their net.tcp transport, but that's proving difficult. The Sun proposal is at least well-defined. I wish they'd asked for comments and started a discussion rather than just making something up, though. Some parts seem lame, such as using nibble encoding, and requiring a response message for every request message (not necessarily appropriate with WS-Addressing involved). It's also a bit heavy-weight, with a SOAP service request to open a channel. - Dennis -- Dennis M. Sosnoski SOA and Web Services in Java Axis2 Training and Consulting http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117 Paul Fremantle wrote: > Guys > > We should develop a compatible transport to this transport: > http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/10/soap-tcp-wcf > > Paul > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org