Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16153 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2007 22:15:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2007 22:15:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 62098 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2007 22:15:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 62041 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2007 22:15:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 62030 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2007 22:15:39 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:15:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of scheu@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.153 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.153] (HELO e35.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:15:36 -0700 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6BMFF3Z027455 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:15:15 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l6BMDwoM209274 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:13:59 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l6BMDwwg024257 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:13:58 -0600 Received: from d03nm118.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm118.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.144]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l6BMDwqC024247 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:13:58 -0600 In-Reply-To: <46955389.5020503@thoughtcraft.com> Subject: Re: [Axis2] JAXWS, Axis2 1.3, and RC2 on 7/13 To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: axis-dev@ws.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF144 February 01, 2006 Message-ID: From: R J Scheuerle Jr Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:16:46 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM118/03/M/IBM(Build V80_M5_05202007|May 20, 2007) at 07/11/2007 16:16:47 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=08BBF986DFEA13248f9e8a93df938690918c08BBF986DFEA1324" Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0__=08BBF986DFEA13248f9e8a93df938690918c08BBF986DFEA1324 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Rich Scheuerle IBM Web Services Apache Axis2 (scheu@apache.org) 512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115) Glen Daniels wrote on 07/11/2007 05:02:49 PM: > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > Does it matter what date *exactly* the branch gets cut? either way we > > need to make sure that you have some place to work. Would it be > > suffice to say, we should cut the branch when we cut RC2 and that at > > any point of time, there will be somewhere where the work can go on? Agreed. > > Broader question - I apologize if I missed something, but what is the > big deal about the branch? As per the release process guidelines we > voted on months ago, changes (in general) happen on the trunk and get > merged over to the branch. So if you're waiting for a branch to have a > "safe place to work and not disturb the trunk" or something like that (I > don't mean to presume anything, I really just don't know what's going > on), that doesn't sound right. > > If you want a branch to do experimental work on, that is NOT the purpose > of a release branch - cut your own whenever you please. If you've got > stuff which needs to go in to 1.3, and it doesn't break the build, check > it in! :) If you are making serious changes that affect architecture or > APIs, please post diffs and/or a pre-commit discussion thread so we can > vet them... and THEN check them(*) in! :) Hi Glen, We are not working on anything experimental or controversial. All of our changes (at this point) are to push JAX-WS towards CTS compliance. The changes outside of jaxws and metadata modules are (IMHO) minor changes and bug fixes. We are not changing APIS. We would like to get all of this work into RC2...but we don't want to hold up RC2 for our changes. Having a branch when RC2 is cut is only necessary so that we can continue work and have these fixes for the 7/20 (per Matt's note). > > Yes/no/maybe? > > Thanks, > --Glen > > * or modified versions as a result of conversation/consensus. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org > --0__=08BBF986DFEA13248f9e8a93df938690918c08BBF986DFEA1324 Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline

Rich Scheuerle
IBM Web Services
Apache Axis2 (scheu@apache.org)
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)

Glen Daniels <glen@thoughtcraft.com> wrote on 07/11/2007 05:02:49 PM:

> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Does it matter what date *exactly* the branch gets cut? either way we
> > need to make sure that you have some place to work. Would it be
> > suffice to say, we should cut the branch when we cut RC2 and that at
> > any point of time, there will be somewhere where the work can go on?


Agreed.

>
> Broader question - I apologize if I missed something, but what is the
> big deal about the branch?  As per the release process guidelines we
> voted on months ago, changes (in general) happen on the trunk and get
> merged over to the branch.  So if you're waiting for a branch to have a
> "safe place to work and not disturb the trunk" or something like that (I
> don't mean to presume anything, I really just don't know what's going
> on), that doesn't sound right.


>
> If you want a branch to do experimental work on, that is NOT the purpose
> of a release branch - cut your own whenever you please.  If you've got
> stuff which needs to go in to 1.3, and it doesn't break the build, check
> it in! :)  If you are making serious changes that affect architecture or
> APIs, please post diffs and/or a pre-commit discussion thread so we can
> vet them... and THEN check them(*) in! :)


Hi Glen,

We are not working on anything experimental or controversial.  All of our changes
(at this point) are to push JAX-WS towards CTS compliance.  The changes outside of jaxws and metadata modules
are (IMHO) minor changes and bug fixes.  We are not changing APIS.  We would like to get all of this work  
into RC2...but we don't want to hold up RC2 for our changes.  Having a branch when RC2 is cut is only necessary so
that we can continue work and have these fixes for the 7/20 (per Matt's note).

>
> Yes/no/maybe?
>
> Thanks,
> --Glen
>
> * or modified versions as a result of conversation/consensus.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
--0__=08BBF986DFEA13248f9e8a93df938690918c08BBF986DFEA1324--