axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eran Chinthaka <chinth...@opensource.lk>
Subject Re: Axis2 contexts use unsyncronized HashMap instead of Hashtables
Date Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:59:18 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
> IIRC the flip side of the same argument was brought as a reason.
> Hashtables are slower than  hashmaps due to the synching.
> In how many places do we have to synch if we just use the map ? if
> there are many I suggest we use the hashtable. However if there are
> only one or two place where we have to sync then I suggest we keep the
> maps for performance reasons.

At the same time we haven't seen any problems so far using hashmaps. So
why do we wanna fix it for some futuristic reason. I would wait and use
hashmap just for performance reasons and wait till anything comes up.

Chinthaka
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGbrTGjON2uBzUhh8RApIPAJ4i54h4xgcAHqQBif+LIs0qPSlD2QCePCrF
FxzePpJLKjxdKfFBkVBES+s=
=nOjK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Mime
View raw message