Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68142 invoked from network); 12 May 2007 21:04:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2007 21:04:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 50830 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2007 21:04:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 50808 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2007 21:04:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 50797 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2007 21:04:22 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 May 2007 14:04:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.123.75.163] (HELO sosnoski.com) (206.123.75.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 May 2007 14:04:15 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ip-58-28-158-218.ubs-dsl.xnet.co.nz [58.28.158.218]) (authenticated bits=0) by sosnoski.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l4CL3llm015223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 17:03:54 -0400 Message-ID: <46462BB2.3080800@sosnoski.com> Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:03:46 +1200 From: Dennis Sosnoski Organization: Sosnoski Software User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [Axis2] What's next - 1.2.1 or 1.3? References: <19e0530f0705111913g63a60124j35eb38ef61bd5857@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <19e0530f0705111913g63a60124j35eb38ef61bd5857@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 for 1.2.1. Assuming this goes, I'd like to update to the latest JiBX release jars, too. - Dennis Dennis M. Sosnoski SOA and Web Services in Java Axis2 Training and Consulting http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117 Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Folks, > > Can we make a case for a 1.2.1? (Real soon?) I guess we should cut it > from the 1.2 branch. It should have absolutely minimal changes from > 1.2. For example the unwrapping changes for ADB that Amila checked in > today comes to mind. If Michele confirms the fix for the > AUTO_RELEASE_CONNECTION related changes that can be ported as well. > What else do we absolutely need to fix? If the list grows too long, it > may be better to just stick to trunk and do a 1.3 very soon (but not > as fast as we can cut 1.2.1). Anyways, what do you all think? Are > there changes needed by Rampart and/or Sandesha and/or Synapse and/or > Tuscany etc that dictate that we should do a quick 1.2.1? WDYT? > > thanks, > dims > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org