Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.236 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Uv3j/9tDm2BZApAYJ5LFn230nXchaxv9JV5jNb4nKOzV3pb1NrbexiCpYNrvCHqNfdrGU7wM0doQ0RkOYSfgQZ0Vz8U3hCEbfxez1eTP9hzU5BCtRSPG1eRHnj2QPiMEQuGjkIK8aUiggbNW2YqKwsKs9Pr/xiDD9QbObWoEP0Y=
Message-ID: <19e0530f0705112256q741874acie4402b8bc8245ae8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 01:56:03 -0400
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <davanum@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dims@apache.org
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] What's next - 1.2.1 or 1.3?
In-Reply-To: <464547B4.2020608@opensource.lk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <19e0530f0705111913g63a60124j35eb38ef61bd5857@mail.gmail.com>
	 <464547B4.2020608@opensource.lk>

No new features :) Only critical bugs should be addressed in 1.2.1 the
CLOSE_WAIT problem was very serious and made multi threaded
ServiceClient async calls totally unusable.

-- dims

On 5/12/07, Eran Chinthaka <chinthaka@opensource.lk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I added a new property for Option to allow the user to give a custom
> socket factory, while working with https. If this can also go in to the
> release it would be great. But if this makes the list longer you can
> forget it.
>
> Thanks,
> Chinthaka
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Can we make a case for a 1.2.1? (Real soon?) I guess we should cut it
> > from the 1.2 branch. It should have absolutely minimal changes from
> > 1.2. For example the unwrapping changes for ADB that Amila checked in
> > today comes to mind. If Michele confirms the fix for the
> > AUTO_RELEASE_CONNECTION related changes that can be ported as well.
> > What else do we absolutely need to fix? If the list grows too long, it
> > may be better to just stick to trunk and do a 1.3 very soon (but not
> > as fast as we can cut 1.2.1). Anyways, what do you all think? Are
> > there changes needed by Rampart and/or Sandesha and/or Synapse and/or
> > Tuscany etc that dictate that we should do a quick 1.2.1? WDYT?
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFGRUe0jON2uBzUhh8RAqH7AJ49WEuEkg705M6fGSj/A0Ugvz6X6wCdESoo
> A9pKqYDSOok97RX9p1SGeHo=
> =ulYj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org