axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ruchith Fernando" <ruchith.ferna...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Axis2] Module description
Date Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:43:17 GMT
On 3/28/07, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@opensource.lk> wrote:
> +1 to use a single convention .. I think Glen removed an incorrect use of
> equalsIgnoreCase in Axiom ... which is probably what's causing breakage.
>
> I suggest going with normal camelCase.

Are we going to do this for 1.2?

Thanks,
Ruchith

>
> Sanjiva.
>
> Saminda Abeyruwan wrote:
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > In module.xml, the description element was written as "Description"
> > sometimes back. Now the description element name should be written as
> > "description"  in order to get the description from AxisModule.
> >
> > If you look at the addressing module.xml; it is still "Description".
> >
> > Looking at the other elements that should appear in module.xml such as
> > "InFlow", "OutFlow" have followed the Camel case convention.
> >
> > Modules such as Sandesha, Rampart etc have the description element as
> > "Description".
> >
> > Why would suddenly change the description element name.
> >
> >
> > single snapshot from addressing module.xml
> >
> > <module name="addressing"
> > class="org.apache.axis2.addressing.AddressingModule">
> >     <Description>This is WS-Addressing implementation on Axis2.
> > Currently we have implemented Submission version (2004/08) and Proposed
> > Recommendation.</Description>
> >     <InFlow>
> >         <handler name="AddressingFinalInHandler"
> > class="org.apache.axis2.handlers.addressing.AddressingFinalInHandler">
> >             <order phase="PreDispatch"/>
> >         </handler>
> >         <handler name="AddressingSubmissionInHandler"
> > class="org.apache.axis2.handlers.addressing.AddressingSubmissionInHandler">
> >             <order phase="PreDispatch"/>
> >         </handler>
> >         <handler name="AddressingValidationHandler"
> > class="org.apache.axis2.handlers.addressing.AddressingValidationHandler">
> >             <order phase="Dispatch" after="AddressingBasedDispatcher"/>
> >         </handler>
> >     </InFlow>
> > ...
> > </module>
> >
> >
> > As you see some element names  are following the Camel case convention
> > and some are not.  Shouldn't we need to have a single convention. {ex:
> > Synapse configuration language format}.
> >
> > As a users point of view what would be the best solution.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Saminda
> >
> > --
> > Saminda Abeyruwan
> >
> > Software Engineer
> > WSO2 Inc. - www.wso2.org <http://www.wso2.org>
>
> --
> Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
> Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
> Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
> Director; Open Source Initiative; http://www.opensource.org/
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
> Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>


-- 
www.ruchith.org
www.wso2.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Mime
View raw message